> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 04 July 2013 17:10
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: aemne...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic
>
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:21:55AM +, Ra
+1 - let us not remove them. If they are not suitable for BVT, include them in
regression suite.
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2013 3:09 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic
why would
d Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 04 July 2013 15:39
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic
> >
> > why would we remove these cases and not find the root cause, if there is an
> > issue, and fixing that.
>
This could happen if there is a stickiness policy configured on the LB rule.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 04 July 2013 15:39
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic
>
> why would
why would we remove these cases and not find the root cause, if there is an
issue, and fixing that.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some of the BVT test cases verify if load balancing rule set to round
> robin is working or not.
> It is seen that often LBing
Hello,
Some of the BVT test cases verify if load balancing rule set to round robin is
working or not.
It is seen that often LBing is not perfect round robin. If first request goes
to one vm the next does not always go to second,
when there are just two vms added to LB rule.
I vaguely recall di
