om]
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:46 PM
> To: Alena Prokharchyk; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers
> Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0
> failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with
> security grou
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0
failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with
security groups)
Advance zone with SG is not in 4.1.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:37 PM
To
Advance zone with SG is not in 4.1.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:37 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers; Anthony Xu
Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0
failed due to no public
e.com
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com]
>Sent: 13 May 2013 18:38
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to
>4.1.0 failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced
gt; As it was an advanced zone with security groups I didn't get the
> option to add/configure a public network.
>
> > CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed du
zone I received the following message:
>
> 'Cannot enable this Zone since: Unable to find the default physical
> network with traffic=Public in the specified zone id'
>
> As it was an advanced zone with security groups I didn't get the option to
> add/configure a pu
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 10:30:13AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Did v2 to v3 require an updated system vm? I thougth someone had mentioned
> that. I don't think 3 -> 4 did.
Yes, v2 to v3 did require new VMs (which Nicolas has mentioned that he's
applied). Same update actually applies to v2 to
Did v2 to v3 require an updated system vm? I thougth someone had mentioned
that. I don't think 3 -> 4 did.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:24:16PM +0200, nicolas.lamirault@orange.comwrote:
> > Hi,
> > our database upgrade works fine now. On the
this routes was added by CS dynamically
Le 02/05/2013 18:25, Chip Childers a écrit :
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:24:16PM +0200, nicolas.lamira...@orange.com wrote:
Hi,
our database upgrade works fine now. On the SSVM, when we have
rebooted it , all network static routes disapeared.
does anyone e
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:24:16PM +0200, nicolas.lamira...@orange.com wrote:
> Hi,
> our database upgrade works fine now. On the SSVM, when we have
> rebooted it , all network static routes disapeared.
> does anyone else have this trouble?
Are these routes that you manually placed on the SSVM by
Hi,
our database upgrade works fine now. On the SSVM, when we have rebooted
it , all network static routes disapeared.
does anyone else have this trouble?
--
Nicolas Lamirault
__
11 matches
Mail list logo