Hello everyone,
It will be great if Trillian supports hosts with UEFI enabled. This could
avoid code changes that break UEFI functionality unintentionally. There are
already tests for UEFI included in Marvin.
Best regards,
Slavka
rvin
test failures. Trillian is the automation that creates the environments to run
the tests in, the tests are purely those that are in Marvin codebase so anyone
can repeat them. In fact we would like to see other people running the tests
in their environments and comparing the results.
With
Hi Marc-Aurèle, (and everyone else)
The title probably is slightly incorrect. It should really say known Marvin
test failures. Trillian is the automation that creates the environments to run
the tests in, the tests are purely those that are in Marvin codebase so anyone
can repeat them. In
Hi Marc,
You've raised a very valid concern. When we've known list of smoketest
failures, it's understandable that most people may not understand how to
interpret them and ignore them. Access to the Trillian environment is another
issue. I don't have all the answers and
@rhtyd
Could something be done to avoid confusing people pushing PR to have
trillian test failures, which apparently are know to fail all the time or
often? I know it's hard to keep the tests in good shape and make them run
smoothly but I find it very disturbing and therefore I have to admi
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Thanks all for your review, tests. Fwd merge did not automatically close
this PR, so closing this manually.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
The same results as 1692. Overall much better state. We have still failure
in execution of the following tests:
test_privategw_acl
test_routers_network_ops
test_vpc_redundant
test
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
@nvazquez @serg38 thank you for your help verifying the is PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Thanks! I'll post results when we can fix issues
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
at a time:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/tools/travis/script.sh#L43
Trillian runs them one at a time as well, you may take some hints from
Trillian's smoketest runner:
https://github.com/shapeblue/Trillian/blob/master/Ansible/roles/marvin/templates/smoke
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
@jburwell @rhtyd we're running tests with @serg38 and we got some errors,
but we notice that `failed_plus_exceptions` and `runinfo` files are empty after
tests finish. When we run individual te
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
@karuturi can you help run BVT tests on this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
@karuturi @swill @wido @NuxRo @nvazquez we believe this PR is ready to
merge. However, we need to cross check the test results. Would one (or more
of you) be able to test this PR in order to
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Trillian test result (tid-145)
Environment: vmware-60u2 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 43150 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Similar to #1703 the test `test_oobm_zchange_password` failed due to env
related config where oobm sync interval was set to 1 second. I've increased the
timeout to 5s, and added some code to clean
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Trillian test result (tid-144)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 36776 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Trillian test result (tid-143)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 32707 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Trillian test result (tid-142)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 24455 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Kicked 4 trillian test envs with xenserver65, kvm centos7, vmware 5.5 and
6.0. We'll see some results in next 6-8 hours.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-60
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Rebased against 4.9 branch, re-kicking packaging and tests.
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Trillian test result (tid-129)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 41336 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Trillian test result (tid-128)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 39080 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Trillian test result (tid-127)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 22766 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-59
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1703
Trillian testrun on PR-1692 merged on 4.9 branch
@blueorangutan package
The aim of the PR is to see how marvin tests perform on 4.9 branch with
recent list of fixes from PR #1692
/cc
Paul,
Thanks for pushing hard on getting Trillian GA.
We've lately became vmware allergic :(
Hoping KVM would be on the roadmap soon.
Thanks
ilya
On 7/8/16 7:38 AM, Will Stevens wrote:
> I can answer this for you. No, it does not support KVM as the base
> hypervisor. This w
I can answer this for you. No, it does not support KVM as the base
hypervisor. This was a design decision early in the Trillian project. We
just need to get some VMware in the lab for testing (we need to do this
anyway).
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420
Followup question: Does Trillian support KVM as the "Base" hypervisor
instead of ESXi? If not, what would it take to enable this.
-Syed
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Syed Mushtaq
wrote:
> Awesome job Paul. I was in such dire need of a tool like this, everything
> I need to ch
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> As some of you may know, I have been working for some time on a project
> called Trillian. This started out as an internal project at $dayjob with
> the intentions of being able to quickly build environments to:
>
>
> a) Test new feature software
Hi all
As some of you may know, I have been working for some time on a project called
Trillian. This started out as an internal project at $dayjob with the
intentions of being able to quickly build environments to:
a) Test new feature software builds (manually and via Marvin)
b
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Flexible CI/CD - Trillian
Hi Paul,
This is great news, good job, naming apart. :-)
Is ESXi a hard requirement on running Trillian?
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Angus&qu
Hi Paul,
This is great news, good job, naming apart. :-)
Is ESXi a hard requirement on running Trillian?
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Angus"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cl
Project: Trillian
We have been working on PoC of a CI environment design which will:
· Provide fast build or rebuild of environments for testing.
· Enable multiple independent concurrent builds
· Be available on-demand through automation or individual request
37 matches
Mail list logo
