ginal Message-
>>> From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 2:20 AM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: StoragePoolForMigrationResponse and StoragePoolResponse
>>>
>>> I agree with Prasanna on this. We
>> >StoragePoolForMigrationResponse to include the StoragePoolResponse
>> >object and any other flag; suitableformigration in this case. I'll
>>file a bug for
>> the same.
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >Devdeep
>> >
>> >> -Orig
o:min.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 2:20 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: StoragePoolForMigrationResponse and StoragePoolResponse
>
> I agree with Prasanna on this. We don't need to introduce several Storage
> pool related respon
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:28 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: StoragePoolForMigrationResponse and StoragePoolResponse
>>
>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 06:28:39PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 31, 2013
vdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:28 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: StoragePoolForMigrationResponse and StoragePoolResponse
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 06:28:39PM +0530, Prasanna S
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 06:28:39PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:24:20PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote:
> > Hey Prasanna ,
> >
> > I see that the response object name is
> > findstoragepoolsformigrationresponse , which is correct as shown
> > below . Are you referri
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:24:20PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote:
> Hey Prasanna ,
>
> I see that the response object name is
> findstoragepoolsformigrationresponse , which is correct as shown
> below . Are you referring to this API or something else ?
>
> http://MSIP:8096/client/api?command=fin
-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 5:24 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: StoragePoolForMigrationResponse and StoragePoolResponse
For most storage pool related operations I see the standard
StoragePoolResponse. But when using findStoragePoolForMigration the
For most storage pool related operations I see the standard
StoragePoolResponse. But when using findStoragePoolForMigration the
response is StoragePoolForMigrationResponse. The only difference, I
see, between the two is an additional suitableForMigration flag.
Should we be maintaining two kinds of
