> -Original Message-
> From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 3:37 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Review request for storage motion on xenserver
>
> Hi Edison,
>
> Thanks a lot for looking at the changes. I am
com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 3:21 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Review request for storage motion on xenserver
>
> Sorry for the late. Following is my comments on storage motion:
> 1. We shouldn't touch volume state in virutalmachinemanager. I sp
ay, March 29, 2013 8:21 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Review request for storage motion on xenserver
>
> I have put the feature proposed [1] and developed in the feature branch [2]
> up for review. Code for this feature conforms to what was proposed in FS [3].
> The
I have put the feature proposed [1] and developed in the feature branch [2] up
for review. Code for this feature conforms to what was proposed in FS [3]. The
patch available at [4]. It includes marvin tests and unit tests for verifying
the functionality. Please take a look at it and let me know
