Subject: Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
This would also have to provide some info as to what constitutes a smaller disk
offering (then, I suppose, the GUI would use that info to compare the current
offering against the proposed offering).
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:51 AM, John Dilley
com]
> *Sent:* 14 August 2014 02:57
> *To:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> *Cc:* John Dilley
>
> *Subject:* Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
>
>
>
> As an example, I will note that the GUI submits requests to the management
> server that it could - in theory - validate loc
Dilley
Subject: Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
As an example, I will note that the GUI submits requests to the management
server that it could - in theory - validate locally.
However, the GUI is (rightly) intended in CloudStack to be a thin layer on top
of the API. It purposefully avoids
gt;FS at
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Resize+Data+Volumes
>> > claims that XenServer can shrink data volumes. Can I edit it and remove
>> >that claim from FS? Kindly let me know,
>> >
>> >Thank you,
>> >Ch
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:12 PM
> >To: John Dilley
> >Cc:
> >Subject: Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
> >
> >If you're asking what I think, it wo
gt;> > doesn't run during your automation, but can be run by others who
>> > want to test
>> shrinking
>> > on their storage type.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Chandan Purushothama <
>> > chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com> wro
sage-
From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:12 PM
To: John Dilley
Cc:
Subject: Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
If you're asking what I think, it would be RAW. The pool type would be CLVM,
though. This is probably a better solution, as we likely wan
chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Marcus,
> >>
> >> May I know your response,
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Chandan.
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Chandan Purushothama [mailto:chandan.purushoth...@citr
; From: Chandan Purushothama [mailto:chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:37 PM
>> To: Marcus
>> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
>>
>> Hello Marcus,
>>
>> I see that shrinking
ugust 12, 2014 12:37 PM
> To: Marcus
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
>
> Hello Marcus,
>
> I see that shrinking of volume is not supported by XenServer
> (CLOUDSTACK-7228) . May I know whether KVM with CLVM Data Volumes is the
>
Marcus,
May I know your response,
Thank you,
Chandan.
-Original Message-
From: Chandan Purushothama [mailto:chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:37 PM
To: Marcus
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
Hello Marcus,
I see
Yes, this is true. Ideally other storage maintainers/drivers would
implement it as well, but we only committed a test for shrinking clvm (over
a year ago now). I'd like to keep the test itself to run regression against
clvm, but since this test is being used now for some continuous integration
or o
Hello Marcus,
I see that shrinking of volume is not supported by XenServer (CLOUDSTACK-7228)
. May I know whether KVM with CLVM Data Volumes is the only configuration that
supports shrinking of data volume? If Yes, May I know if the corresponding test
case that shrinks data disks be removed fro
13 matches
Mail list logo
