Okie, so I just made a new commit ecale97b to remove vhd-util.
Thanks David,
--Tuna
Sent from my GT-N7000
On Jan 15, 2014 1:24 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
> You can always git revert, but it will revert the entire commit. Aside
> from that you can't change history (ASF git repos are set up to no
Opps... I thought I removed vhd-util from the commit. Will do in next
monday, David. I'm travelling and the internet connection is terrible here.
Thanks,
--Tuna
Sent from my GT-N7000
On Jan 4, 2014 3:26 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Amogh Vasekar
> wrote:
> > Hi,
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> I was in Cambridge before the ccceu13 and worked with the XS team on this.
> They're working on a patch release to 6.2 that will include everything we
> need in vhd-util, which will remove this dependency. It's expected end of
> Jan/start of
ort for them to backport it to all
previous releases but at least going forward, we will be rid of this problem.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Friday, January 3, 2014 12:26 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Nguyen Anh Tu
>
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encountered a conflict while pulling in a branch, and noticed vhd-util
> in the CS code base :
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xens
> erver/vhd-util
>
> Wasn't there a licensing issue with vhd
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xens
> erver/vhd-util
github is not the authoritive source for acs. This is a mirror someone
made and forgot to sync. So that is probably the reason vhd-util is
still in