daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 8:09 AM
> To: =SMTP:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: support for /31 Networks
>
> Devender, do you have a test possibility? Wilder made a fix for master
> which I backported to 4.4:
> https://github.com/DaanHoo
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 8:09 AM
> To: =SMTP:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: support for /31 Networks
>
> Devender, do you have a test possibility? Wilder made a fix for master
> which I backported to 4.4:
> https://github.com/DaanHoogland/cloudstack/tree/4.4
> If y
Hi Daan ,
It"s worked grate, a big thanks for your support
Devender
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 8:09 AM
To: =SMTP:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: support for /31 Networks
Devender, do you have a
Original Message-
>> From: Wilder Rodrigues [mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com]
>> Sent: 22 May 2015 18:23
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: support for /31 Networks
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> We found when it was changed and the reason why:
gt; Devender
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wilder Rodrigues [mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com]
> Sent: 22 May 2015 18:23
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: support for /31 Networks
>
> Hi guys,
>
> We found when it was changed and the reason why:
>
>
Hi ,
Can I get patch file to use /31 subnet in 4.4.2
Devender
-Original Message-
From: Wilder Rodrigues [mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: 22 May 2015 18:23
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: support for /31 Networks
Hi guys,
We found when it was changed and the
c/rfc3021.txt).
This is widely supported on network gear, and in modern operating
systems.
- Si
From: Remi Bergsma mailto:r...@remi.nl>>
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 10:31 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subje
1, 2015 10:31 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: support for /31 Networks
Hi,
This question was answered here as well:
http://markmail.org/message/m7vi342uwm4zr5iv
Support was removed as /31 has no available ip addresses.
Regards,
Remi
2015-05-21 16:
1.txt).
> >
> > This is widely supported on network gear, and in modern operating
> systems.
> >
> > - Si
> >
> >
> > From: Remi Bergsma
> > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 10:31 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack
defined in RFC 3021 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3021.txt).
> >
> > This is widely supported on network gear, and in modern operating
> systems.
> >
> > - Si
> >
> >
> > From: Remi Bergsma
> > Sent: Thursday, M
_
> From: Remi Bergsma
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 10:31 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: support for /31 Networks
>
> Hi,
>
> This question was answered here as well:
> http://markmail.org/message/m7vi342uwm4zr5iv
>
> Support was removed as /3
Interesting enough, there is some info on it:
Using 31-Bit Prefixes on IPv4 Point-to-Point Links
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3021
Perhaps we should restore support? I can imagine that since we are short on
ipv4 addresses, it's a waste to throw two of them away in each network. Any
thoughts?
R
: Thursday, May 21, 2015 10:31 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: support for /31 Networks
Hi,
This question was answered here as well:
http://markmail.org/message/m7vi342uwm4zr5iv
Support was removed as /31 has no available ip addresses.
Regards,
Remi
2015-05-21 16:42 GMT+02:00 Ian Southam
Hi,
This question was answered here as well:
http://markmail.org/message/m7vi342uwm4zr5iv
Support was removed as /31 has no available ip addresses.
Regards,
Remi
2015-05-21 16:42 GMT+02:00 Ian Southam :
> Hi Devender,
>
> You have started quite a discussion in our office about using the .0 and
Hi Devender,
You have started quite a discussion in our office about using the .0 and
putting a host on the cast address …...
Just as a matter of interest, why do you do this - we are presuming it does
actually work ;)
—
Grts!
Ian
> On 21 May 2015, at 10:29, Singh, Devender wrote:
>
> Hi Cl
15 matches
Mail list logo
