: Thursday, 6 June 2013 8:03 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: networkACLList
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:43:31PM +, Kishan Kavala wrote:
> > > Agree that it is redundant. They should be create/list/delete
> > > NetworkACL.
ilto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, 6 June 2013 8:03 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: networkACLList
>
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:43:31PM +, Kishan Kavala wrote:
> > Agree that it is redundant. They should be create/list/delete
> > NetworkACL. But the
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:43:31PM +, Kishan Kavala wrote:
> Agree that it is redundant. They should be create/list/delete
> NetworkACL. But these API names are already used for rules (ACL
> items) within the ACL List.
> This cannot be fixed without breaking backward compatibility.
I was talk
...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 7:40 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: networkACLList
+1 to this .
Sounds more logical and easy to differentiate from an end user perspective as
we are actually creating a container/group of acl rules there.
-Original Message-
From
+1 to this .
Sounds more logical and easy to differentiate from an end user perspective as
we are actually creating a container/group of acl rules there.
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 7:14 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Su
