t;>
>>
>> From: Andrija Panic
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 4:09 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: help/advise needed: Private gateway vs. new physcial network
>> is
_
> From: Andrija Panic
> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 4:09 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: help/advise needed: Private gateway vs. new physcial network
> issue
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> not at all. We use tags onl
.
From: Andrija Panic
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 4:09 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: help/advise needed: Private gateway vs. new physcial network issue
Hi Simon,
not at all. We use tags only for storage and compute(service)/disk
offerings...
But,
I
Hi Simon,
not at all. We use tags only for storage and compute(service)/disk
offerings...
But,
I just found out, even when I change recird in DB record, change KVM label
from bond0.950 to bond0, then disable/enable zone, and even restart mgmt
servers, still ACS provision vlan 999 on top of bond0
Andrija,
Do you have any network tagging setup for your vpc network offerings that
correspond to your zone network tags?
From: Andrija Panic
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 3:46 PM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: help/advise nee
