thanks, it thought it didn;t have a plugable nic. I fixed it.
I read this advice in Donals blog on logging to, very helpful.
regards,
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Dan,
>
> There should be a warning right above that exception. What does that warning
> say? It gives the
Dan,
There should be a warning right above that exception. What does that warning
say? It gives the actual state of the router that it thinks it's in.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2013 4:13 AM
> To: dev
t;
> It explains why there is a second set of logs on the XenServer hypervisor.
>
> DL
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: 08 August 2013 12:55
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: anyone please
Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 08 August 2013 12:55
> To:
> Subject: Re: anyone please: firewall rules application
>
>
> Check the host logs (in xen /var/log/SMlog) to see which script is causing the
> failure.
>
> Thanks,
> jayapal
>
Check the host logs (in xen /var/log/SMlog) to see which script is causing the
failure.
Thanks,
jayapal
On 08-Aug-2013, at 4:43 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> I feel I am on a ghost hunt.
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>> H,
>>
>> I noted that in some of the 4.1
One extra nuances is that after going from one version to another the
error message popped up while creation had actually succeeded.
Deleting the rule as a next step failed.
anyone been there, done that?
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I feel I am on a ghost hunt.
>
> On T
