Hi Guys,
That what I say to version 5.
I understand both people these they say version 5.0 is the right way or 4.XX.
For a marketing men version 5 looks like a big deal but under the hood what’s
really new? I know there are new features but what of them is a groundbreaking
feature? For me its
Well, my intention is to prevent the community from doing revolutionary
changes intending to deliver redesigned 5.0, to keep going the current road
improving the codebase, removing the odd stuff like 'Citrix NetScaler',
'Juniper XYZ' if nobody supports them, improving current functionality and
addi
I am 100% with @Rohit Yadav with respect to
4.12. I do diverge regarding the next LTS version though.
As you all guys said, the community is small, and as such, if we have the
requirement for multiple major changes, before upgrading the "X" bit in a
release, we will never go there (that is a fact
Sounds good. Altogether, the makeover should be a new user experience and
leverage the latest hypervisor/storage tech and new/redesigned frameworks.
-Suresh
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> I'm in the favour of keeping the 4.x going because no API compatibility is
> broken,
Well, I'm glad the topic raised the discussion. That's great. My point is
very carefully explained by Rohit. It's not a new idea - CloudStack
community is small. Some features are abandoned and broken because of no
developers behind them. I bet certain features still not tested in 4.11.2
because no
I'm in the favour of keeping the 4.x going because no API compatibility is
broken, and as long as we are following semver there is no need. Calling a 4.x
a 5.x just for the sake of bumping versions may cause some perception issue.
Removal of unsupported/poc/incomplete features, plugins including
That sounds reasonable to me.
From: Rafael Weingärtner
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 5:25 PM
To: users
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why CloudStack 5
NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open
attachments
Rafael Weingärtner
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 4:58 PM
> To: dev
> Cc: users
> Subject: Re: Why CloudStack 5
>
> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> saf
Is 4.12 a decent candidate to be branded 5.0 or might we be waiting for some
specific set of backwards-incompatible updates?
From: Rafael Weingärtner
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 4:58 PM
To: dev
Cc: users
Subject: Re: Why CloudStack 5
NetApp Security
Hello Ivan,
Can you provide reasons why not move to a version 5?
To help you, I will provide why I think we should move to 5.0.0 after 4.12.
Therefore, I would expect this 5.0.0 to be an LTS version as well.
1. To begin with, technically, we should already be in version 5 if we
had been fol
10 matches
Mail list logo
