OK - this is now done - we shrank from 93 to 44 reviews due to this.
Lets see if we can get these reviewed or rejected and keep up with
this.
--David
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:59 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> ReviewBoard is pretty bloated. There are currently 93 reviews that are open.
I have not. Yesterday RB went down for some period of time, though
AFAIK, infra restored it.
--David
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> H David,
>
> have you started on this yet?
> I can't reach the review board at the moment.
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:59 PM, David Nalley
H David,
have you started on this yet?
I can't reach the review board at the moment.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:59 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> ReviewBoard is pretty bloated. There are currently 93 reviews that are open.
>
> Some of those haven't been updated in 7 months old.
>
> Unles
7 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Reviewboard needs your attention
> >
> > This is what I see when logged in:
> >
> > http://i.imgur.com/RZvXuy1.png
> >
> > Am I missing something?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
&
7 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Reviewboard needs your attention
>
> This is what I see when logged in:
>
> http://i.imgur.com/RZvXuy1.png
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> ani
---
> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 6:03 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Reviewboard needs your attention
> >
> > Hi Animesh,
> >
> > For whatever reason, I can n
I can see it fine, were you logged in at that time
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 6:03 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Reviewboard needs your attention
>
>
Hi Animesh,
For whatever reason, I can no longer edit
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13865/.
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks!
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote:
> 2013/11/8 Animesh Chaturvedi
>
> > Given that we are approaching the 4.3 feature freeze tomorrow if you have
> > su
2013/11/8 Animesh Chaturvedi
> Given that we are approaching the 4.3 feature freeze tomorrow if you have
> submitted patches and are still pending reviews please reach out to your
> reviewers
Dear Sebastien & Hugo,
I have two pending patches on review board need to review:
Rebase OVS (sdnexte
I hate to move deadline, but it might be good to have couple days to try to
clean review board.
-Sebastien
On 7 Nov 2013, at 19:26, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
> There are large number of patches in review board. I went through some of
> them and followed up and closed out few that are already
Hey Chip,
Working on it! :-)
Cheers,
Hugo
On Friday, July 26, 2013, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hugo,
>
> Any chance you could add some logic to pick the right branch for the build
> test?
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Hugo Trippaers
> >
> wrote:
>
> > The job is running on jenkins.clouds
Hugo,
Any chance you could add some logic to pick the right branch for the build
test?
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> The job is running on jenkins.cloudstack.org
>
> This is de job doing the work:
>
> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/management/job/mgmt-build-revie
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:06:31PM +0200, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> The job is running on jenkins.cloudstack.org
>
> This is de job doing the work:
>
> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/management/job/mgmt-build-reviewboard-requests/
>
> This is the job being executed with the patch:
>
The job is running on jenkins.cloudstack.org
This is de job doing the work:
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/management/job/mgmt-build-reviewboard-requests/
This is the job being executed with the patch:
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/cloudstack-master-with-patc
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 09:46:59AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On 20 jul. 2013, at 10:09, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:20:11AM +0200, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 20 jul. 2013, at 10:09, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:20:11AM +0200, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 19, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>>
good stuff, does it ru
Sent from my iPhone
On 20 jul. 2013, at 10:09, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:20:11AM +0200, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 19, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>
>>> good stuff, does it run the risk of running while another instance is busy?
>>
>> Probab
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:20:11AM +0200, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> > good stuff, does it run the risk of running while another instance is busy?
>
> Probably not, it's a single threaded script. I intend to use jenkins
> to schedule it and i
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 06:51:29PM +0200, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've been working on some scripting to get patches submitted on review board
> automagically tested with Jenkins.
>
> The way it works is that a script will check if the jenkins user on
> review board (catofong) has c
On Jul 19, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> good stuff, does it run the risk of running while another instance is busy?
Probably not, it's a single threaded script. I intend to use jenkins to
schedule it and i can tell jenkins not to start another instance of a job once
one is running
good stuff, does it run the risk of running while another instance is busy?
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 06:51:29PM +0200, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I've been working on some scripting to get patches submitted on review
>
Freaking awesome.
I saw that hit the ML, and was just about to ask about it.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've been working on some scripting to get patches submitted on review
> board automagically tested with Jenkins.
>
> The way it works is that a s
22 matches
Mail list logo
