> On May 7, 2014, 11:15 a.m., Girish Shilamkar wrote:
> > Could you please rebase the patch to 4.4-forward ?
>
> Vinay Varma wrote:
> Same patch can be appliend for 4.4-forward branch also. Please apply the
> patch
>
> Vinay Varma wrote:
> As discussed with santhosh, will re-check this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21009/#review42401
---
Could you please rebase the patch to 4.4-forward ?
- Girish Shilamk
> On May 7, 2014, 11:15 a.m., Girish Shilamkar wrote:
> > Could you please rebase the patch to 4.4-forward ?
>
> Vinay Varma wrote:
> Same patch can be appliend for 4.4-forward branch also. Please apply the
> patch
As discussed with santhosh, will re-check this patch for 4.4-forward and wi
> On May 7, 2014, 11:15 a.m., Girish Shilamkar wrote:
> > Could you please rebase the patch to 4.4-forward ?
Same patch can be appliend for 4.4-forward branch also. Please apply the patch
- Vinay
---
This is an automatically generated e
Hi Anish,
I see that this file has crossed 9500+ LOC and with total 9 Test Classes
and according to Log attached, it's taking 12-13 minutes to run just 1 Test
Class. It will take even more time in daily runs if we run this serially.
So if you think that this test suit can be divided into differen
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21009/#review42133
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On May 2, 2014, 8:35 a.m.,
