On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 04:48:58PM +0200, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> Yes. and the patch for CLOUDSTACK-962 as well. Thanks!
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11181/
>
> Wei
Both were applied to 4.1. Can you please review to be sure that they
are in correctly.
Also, do either patch still need
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11157/#review20588
---
Commit aed9a623d81c922af53e9c1f7116c1c7c85fdda5 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11157/#review20587
---
Ship it!
Committed to 4.1:
commit aed9a623d81c922af53e9c1f7116c1c7
Hi Chip,
Yes. and the patch for CLOUDSTACK-962 as well. Thanks!
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11181/
Wei
2013/5/15 Chip Childers
> Should this be applied to 4.1?
>
> -chip
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:16:57AM +, Kishan Kavala wrote:
> >
> > ---
Should this be applied to 4.1?
-chip
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:16:57AM +, Kishan Kavala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11157/#review20572
> --
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11157/#review20572
---
Ship it!
commit 737063891592af1d896f150cca02ff3d63a0198c
- Kishan