> On April 11, 2013, 1:26 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Hi - the content looks good, but the actual patch looks wonky. Doesn't
> > apply. Can you reformat and make sure that it applies against master?
> > (Actually try applying it to master as a patch, if you haven't.) Thanks!
>
> Pascal Bor
> On April 11, 2013, 1:26 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Hi - the content looks good, but the actual patch looks wonky. Doesn't
> > apply. Can you reformat and make sure that it applies against master?
> > (Actually try applying it to master as a patch, if you haven't.) Thanks!
>
> Pascal Bor
If you can prepare a patch for master branch, it is welcome of course ! :-)
2013/04/11 22:45、"Pascal Borreli" のメッセージ:
>
>
>> On April 11, 2013, 1:26 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>>> Hi - the content looks good, but the actual patch looks wonky. Doesn't
>>> apply. Can you reformat and make sure
> On April 11, 2013, 1:26 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Hi - the content looks good, but the actual patch looks wonky. Doesn't
> > apply. Can you reformat and make sure that it applies against master?
> > (Actually try applying it to master as a patch, if you haven't.) Thanks!
my original pl
> On April 11, 2013, 9:45 a.m., Hiroaki Kawai wrote:
> > Ship It!
Hiroaki, did this patch apply for you - it didn't for me. I used "git am -3"
against master. Curious what you did differently. Thanks!
- Joe
---
This is an automatically
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10411/#review19001
---
Hi - the content looks good, but the actual patch looks wonky. Doesn
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10411/#review18995
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Hiroaki Kawai
On April 10, 2013, 11:06 p.m.,
