va...@privaz.io.INVALID%3e>
Sent: 24 March 2021 10:33
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>;
dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: RE: Virutal Router MTU
H
hapeblue.com
> http://www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael del Valle " target="_blank">
> Sent: 24 March 2021 10:33
> To: us...@
.
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
>
> alex.matti...@shapeblue.com
> http://www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael del Valle " target="_
m
3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Rafael del Valle
Sent: 24 March 2021 10:33
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: RE: Virutal Router MTU
Hi
Hi Alex,
In our particular use case the Public Network is an SD WAN and we have a
requirement of slightly smaller MTU than the standard 1500.
I have assumed that our traffic will be encapsulated into something else before
delivery, I guess that is the reason for the requirement.
What would be
