Re: Localization

2013-07-11 Thread Mike Tutkowski
OK - thanks! On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Koushik Das wrote: > That's correct. Currently all messages are hard-coded in the Java code. > First all these strings needs to be moved out to something like a 'resource > file' and only then they can be localized. > > > -Original Message-

RE: Localization

2013-07-10 Thread Koushik Das
That's correct. Currently all messages are hard-coded in the Java code. First all these strings needs to be moved out to something like a 'resource file' and only then they can be localized. > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Thursda

Re: localization tables in CS database

2013-05-21 Thread Mike Tutkowski
This is the file I'm aware of: client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties I can't say I understand completely how L10N works in CS, but this properties file might be a good place for you to start. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Adnan Ashraf < mohammad.adnan.ash...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: localization tables in CS database

2013-05-21 Thread David Nalley
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Adnan Ashraf wrote: > Hi, > > I would appreciate if anyone could point me to understand how cloudstack > schema model accommodates the localization strings within its database > tables. I am interested in understanding whether a central strings table is > used or

Re: localization tables in CS database

2013-05-21 Thread Mike Tutkowski
For example, I notice we seem to hard code English strings in the text of exceptions we throw. I've never tried to view these exceptions while running under a language other than English, but I somewhat doubt they are translated. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@