GSLB it's a kind of LoadBalancer balancing other load balancers.
If I implement "Cross Zone LoadBalancer" using GSLB, I will need one public
IP + 1 LB for each zone and I have a lot of load balancers. I will waste to
much IPs.
Without cross zones LB I can't achieve HA because if entire zone fail, I
He seemed to not want to use GSLB for some reason.
On Oct 14, 2014 9:40 PM, "Rajesh Battala" wrote:
> If you use Netscaler as LB provider in your cloudstack, Netscaler has a
> supported feature called GSLB.
> This feature is Load Balancer across zones. It's been in Cloudstack long
> back.
>
> Tha
If you use Netscaler as LB provider in your cloudstack, Netscaler has a
supported feature called GSLB.
This feature is Load Balancer across zones. It's been in Cloudstack long back.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Silvano Nogueira Buback [mailto:silv...@corp.globo.com]
Se
He wouldn't need to do that unless he wanted to hack cloudstack to manage
it for him in the process.
Cloudstack doesn't do it natively, but there is nothing to stop you from
bringing up your own VM and making it into a cross zone loadbalancer.
On Oct 14, 2014 9:09 PM, "Yitao Jiang" wrote:
> AFAI
AFAIK, currently ACS suport LoadBalancer among vms within same network of
single advanced zone.
Maybe you can hack system vm to meet your needs
---
Thanks,
Yitao(依涛 姜)
jiangyt.github.io
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Silvano Nogueira Buback <
silv...@corp.globo.com> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> The
