ity
> group while the Instance is running.
>
> Wido
>
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1297
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Me
adrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Wido den Hollander"
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 January, 2016 15:37:39
>> Subject: Re: KVM: Security grouping through libvirt instead of Python
e.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 January, 2016 15:37:39
> Subject: Re: KVM: Security grouping through libvirt instead of Python
> On 06-01-16 16:20, Nux! wrote:
>> That's great! Fine by me then, but we need to be careful and not mess up the
>> SG
>> bits for XenServer.
>
udstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 January, 2016 14:38:17
>> Subject: Re: KVM: Security grouping through libvirt instead of Python
>
>> On 06-01-16 13:12, Nux! wrote:
>>> Hi Wido,
>>>
>>> +1 for using more libvirt and less custom stuff, but what d
den Hollander"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 January, 2016 14:38:17
> Subject: Re: KVM: Security grouping through libvirt instead of Python
> On 06-01-16 13:12, Nux! wrote:
>> Hi Wido,
>>
>> +1 for using more libvirt and less custom stuff, but w
On 06-01-16 13:12, Nux! wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
> +1 for using more libvirt and less custom stuff, but what do we do about
> XenServer? SG is supported with it as well and there is no libvirt there.
> Would this be a different implementation just for KVM?
>
Yes. For KVM we control almost everythi
Hi Wido,
+1 for using more libvirt and less custom stuff, but what do we do about
XenServer? SG is supported with it as well and there is no libvirt there.
Would this be a different implementation just for KVM?
In addition, I have the following in production and it's not clear if it would
conti
