ry storage only being
>>>>>>> available to a single cluster and not zone wide like 4.2.0 provides?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Travis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 4, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>
a single cluster and not zone wide like 4.2.0 provides?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Travis
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 4, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>&g
gt;>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Maybe this is a silly question, but if CS handles Live Migrations,
>>>>> are we
>>>>> > still constrained to migrating VMs from one host to another in the
>>>>
question, but if CS handles Live Migrations,
>>>> are we
>>>> > still constrained to migrating VMs from one host to another in the
>>>> same
>>>> > cluster?
>>>> >
>>>> > Same question for HA.
>>>> >
>>
>> we
>>> > still constrained to migrating VMs from one host to another in the same
>>> > cluster?
>>> >
>>> > Same question for HA.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Clayton Weise
>>>
at I would vote for.
>> >>
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 9:26 PM
>> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> Subject
;s a great RFE that I would vote for.
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 9:26 PM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Hypervisor Ques
e-
>> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 9:26 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Hypervisor Questions
>>
>> Oh, and, yes, when I referred to HA, it was (as you said) with the meaning
>> of a
vote for.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 9:26 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Hypervisor Questions
>
> Oh, and, yes, when I referred to HA, it was (as you said) with the m
AFAIK, no, but it's a great RFE that I would vote for.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 9:26 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hypervisor Questions
Oh, and, yes, when I referred to HA, it wa
Oh, and, yes, when I referred to HA, it was (as you said) with the meaning
of a host going offline and VMs being restarted on other hosts (perhaps in
a prioritized order if there are an insufficient number of resources to
support all of the VMs that were running on the downed host).
Does CS suppor
Thanks, Clayton!
Yeah, copy/paste mistake there. :) I meant it as you said.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Clayton Weise wrote:
> First, I think you meant to put XenServer, KVM, and VMware and not
> XenServer 3 times in a row. That being said I think in all cases (somebody
> correct me if I'
First, I think you meant to put XenServer, KVM, and VMware and not XenServer 3
times in a row. That being said I think in all cases (somebody correct me if
I'm wrong here) it goes something like this:
Live Migration: Request is made by CS but carried out by the HV.
High Availability: More accur
13 matches
Mail list logo
