Re: Feature proposal: Resource naming policies

2016-04-15 Thread Koushik Das
PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Feature proposal: Resource naming policies With this feature, it is possible to change the names that get sent to the hypervisor, yes. In 4.2 we actually had to fix an issue with the security groups because they weren't parsing properly. That isn

Re: Feature proposal: Resource naming policies

2016-04-14 Thread ilya
Awesome and long awaited On 4/14/16 4:40 AM, Jeff Hair wrote: > Yesterday, we submitted this pull request: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1492 > > This originally grew out of making the VirtualMachineName class non-static > (original PR is mentioned in the above link). We're pr

Re: Feature proposal: Resource naming policies

2016-04-14 Thread Jeff Hair
With this feature, it is possible to change the names that get sent to the hypervisor, yes. In 4.2 we actually had to fix an issue with the security groups because they weren't parsing properly. That isn't in the commit yet. We will put it in. It would be useful to have a list of all the places th

Re: Feature proposal: Resource naming policies

2016-04-14 Thread Koushik Das
Are these the names that are sent to HV? For e.g. VM name in the format i-xx-yy-VM. Currently there are functionalities that rely on the internal naming convention. All such functionalities needs to be handled appropriately. -Koushik From: Jeff Hair Sen

Re: Feature proposal: Resource naming policies

2016-04-14 Thread Daan Hoogland
sounds usefull for companies that for instance want to enforce uuid in name or include some user string in it, same would be true for networks. look forward to your design. On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Jeff Hair wrote: > Yesterday, we submitted this pull request: > https://github.com/apache/