On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Ian Duffy wrote:
>> It's doable but have not yet discussed and voted if we wanted to make it
> an official mechanism.
>
> Would love to see it happen. I recall review board being a massive pain
> point for a few reasons:
>
> 1) Large patches fail to upload, especial
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Ian Duffy wrote:
> > It's doable but have not yet discussed and voted if we wanted to make it
> an official mechanism.
>
> Would love to see it happen. I recall review board being a massive pain
> point for a few reasons:
>
>
+1
as a non-committer it is far easier
> It's doable but have not yet discussed and voted if we wanted to make it
an official mechanism.
Would love to see it happen. I recall review board being a massive pain
point for a few reasons:
1) Large patches fail to upload, especially if they contain images. I
recall sending many patches by e
On Sep 2, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Stephen Turner wrote:
> So just to be clear, Sebastien, does that mean it's acceptable for
> non-committers to submit their code for review via a Github pull request,
> instead of using ReviewBoard? (I hope so: I think that will make the process
> easier and so en
So just to be clear, Sebastien, does that mean it's acceptable for
non-committers to submit their code for review via a Github pull request,
instead of using ReviewBoard? (I hope so: I think that will make the process
easier and so encourage contributions).
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Me
