Re: BVT report on 4.3 branch

2014-01-30 Thread Srikanteswararao Talluri
Hey Daan, It is a mistake while clubbing two reports #1174 and #1175. Thanks for pointing out. Initially there are 12 failures in #1174 and when I reran #1175 there are indeed only 3 failures overall. Thanks, ~Talluri On 30/01/14 3:48 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >H Talluri, > >in the report su

Re: BVT report on 4.3 branch

2014-01-30 Thread Daan Hoogland
H Talluri, in the report summary for xen it says >Fail :5 but i only see these 3 >test_loadbalance/ 0 3 0 am i missing something? (the kvm failures seem to match the summary) when I folow the links I see 12 and 3 failures respectively. I'm sure I'm

Re: BVT report on 4.3 branch

2014-01-29 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
This basically means a +1 on 4.3? I think there were couple of issues that emerged in the RC particularly the missing response params in the list* API that Alena reported. We should probably include a test for that in the integration suite. I would've done it had I had some bandwidth, but thought