8 December 2016 00:11:42
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status
All,
We've now only following PRs blocking the release process to be started:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
Along wit
Hi Mike, yes I'll have a look.
Hi Patrick, thanks -- your PR is a bugfix and I'll have a look.
Regards.
From: Patrick Dube
Sent: 08 December 2016 06:54:34
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status
Hi Rohit,
Cou
.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
>
>
> Thanks and regards.
>
> ____________
> From: Rohit Yadav
> Sent: 27 November 201
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Thanks and regards.
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: 27 November 2016 22:08:52
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.
che.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status
All,
We've several open PRs, I'll try to get some of them reviewed, tested and
merged in next two days. Please help with reviewing and testing open PRs.
To avoid further delaying starting RC/voting threads, after middle of the wee
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Thanks and regards.
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: 27 November 2016 22:08:52
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status
All,
We're
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: 24 November 2016 12:24:00
To: John Burwell; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status
All,
We've managed to review/merge few PRs, but we still have five more to go after
which we should be able to cut RCs. We
All,
We've managed to review/merge few PRs, but we still have five more to go after
which we should be able to cut RCs. We've following PRs pending from previous
list:
* 4.10.0.0
* 1545 (code review comments; regression tests pending)
* 1577 (Jenkins failures; regression tests pending)
Ok John, i will ping you and Rohit again when we start to work for 4.9.2
release. Thanks for your time.
Özhan
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:32 PM, John Burwell
wrote:
> Ozhan,
>
> As I said on the PR, #1710 addresses a fairly narrow case (RBD on KVM),
> and 4.9.1.0 is extremely late. There are a l
Ozhan,
As I said on the PR, #1710 addresses a fairly narrow case (RBD on KVM), and
4.9.1.0 is extremely late. There are a lot “small” fixes that could be
included. However, it would further delay delivery of significant dies that
nearly all users. At some point, we must draw a line, and this
Hi John & Rohit;
If we have time could we add PR 1710 to the upcoming RC for 4.9.1.0. Its a
small fix but its waiting for log time...
Thanks again,
Özhan
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:23 AM, John Burwell
wrote:
> All,
>
> I apologize for being relatively radio silent. We have mage good progress
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
