Re: 4.6 status update

2015-11-03 Thread Remi Bergsma
FYI: once PR 1023 is merged (fixes final blocker) I'll create a 4.6 RC for us all to test. Had planned to do it tonight but there's one test failing and I want to be 100% sure it all works and all tests pass. To be resolved tomorrow. Almost there! Regards, Remi Sent from my iPhone > On 30 O

Re: 4.6 status update

2015-10-30 Thread Remi Bergsma
Hi all, The blocker mentioned below has been fixed. Its PR (1008) is almost ready to be merged. In the mean while, Mike reported an issue, that is now our single blocker. Waiting for more info on it. Lots of PRs were merged, thanks to all that tested, reviewed or otherwise helped out. Could y

Re: 4.6 status update

2015-10-29 Thread Jan-Arve Nygård
Hi, Not my pull request, but is this something that can be reviewed for 4.6 or is it too late? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8682 (Replace openswan ipsec with strongswan ipsec) https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 -Jan-Arve 2015-10-29 9:28 GMT+01:00 Remi Bergsma : >

Re: 4.6 status update

2015-10-29 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 29-10-15 09:28, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi, > > We’re down to a single blocker: > > 1) CentOS 7 - systemd-tmpfiles - Operation not permitted > This is about the CentOS 7 packaging of the Management Server. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8812 > > > PRs for 4.6 > ==

Re: 4.6 status update after QA Day yesterday

2015-10-25 Thread Remi Bergsma
Thanks! Sent from my iPhone On 25 Oct 2015, at 14:15, Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: Hi Remi, On 24-Oct-2015, at 4:43 PM, Remi Bergsma mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: 2) VR password server broken https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8957 ==> Roh

Re: 4.6 status update after QA Day yesterday

2015-10-25 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi Remi, On 24-Oct-2015, at 4:43 PM, Remi Bergsma mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: 2) VR password server broken https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8957 ==> Rohit is working on this, or not? No recent update. Please unassign if someone else needs to take over. Do you nee

Re: 4.6 status update after QA Day yesterday

2015-10-24 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hey Remi, I have rebased PR 968 on top of master. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi Remi, > > I'd like to include this one in 4.6 (small and low risk): > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968/files > > Thanks, > M

Re: 4.6 status update after QA Day yesterday

2015-10-24 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hi Remi, I'd like to include this one in 4.6 (small and low risk): https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968/files Thanks, Mike On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi all, > > Lots of work has been done yesterday! PRs were reviewed, tested, merged, > some were improved

Re: 4.6 status update after QA Day yesterday

2015-10-24 Thread Daan Hoogland
Yesterday was long and tiring but very productive afaict. we should do this *some* times. congratulations on the results every body. On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi all, > > Lots of work has been done yesterday! PRs were reviewed, tested, merged, > some were improved an