Marcus,
If the issue is not yet fixed, let me know i will try fix it.
Regards,
Santhosh
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Is anyone running 4.5 mgmt server in cluster setup? I've run into an
> issue where the channel between the two servers is null, and I think
> I've tracked it
Excellent, thanks :-)
--
Erik
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Marcus wrote:
> Yes
> On Apr 15, 2015 12:30 AM, "Erik Weber" wrote:
>
> > Would this explain things like this in a cluster node log, or am I seeing
> > something else?
> >
> > 2015-04-08 22:22:47,471 INFO [c.c.a.m.ClusteredAgentM
Yes
On Apr 15, 2015 12:30 AM, "Erik Weber" wrote:
> Would this explain things like this in a cluster node log, or am I seeing
> something else?
>
> 2015-04-08 22:22:47,471 INFO [c.c.a.m.ClusteredAgentManagerImpl]
> (StatsCollector-1:ctx-8f16a26f) SSL: Handshake done
> 2015-04-08 22:22:47,471 DEB
Would this explain things like this in a cluster node log, or am I seeing
something else?
2015-04-08 22:22:47,471 INFO [c.c.a.m.ClusteredAgentManagerImpl]
(StatsCollector-1:ctx-8f16a26f) SSL: Handshake done
2015-04-08 22:22:47,471 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.ClusteredAgentManagerImpl]
(StatsCollector-1:ctx-8f
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8387 if anyone can take it.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Marcus wrote:
> I'm opening a bug, should I assign it to you, or do you know of
> someone who maintains this code? It is probably pretty urgent to go
> out in the next 4.5 bugfix
>
>
> O
I'm opening a bug, should I assign it to you, or do you know of
someone who maintains this code? It is probably pretty urgent to go
out in the next 4.5 bugfix
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Marcus wrote:
> Yeah, I backed out the change in my test environment and the issue went away.
>
> On We
Yeah, I backed out the change in my test environment and the issue went away.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Bharat Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guss you are correct. we need to add the newly created channel ch1 to the
> map after the handshake is complete.
>
> _peers.put(peerName, ch) should be
Hi,
I guss you are correct. we need to add the newly created channel ch1 to the map
after the handshake is complete.
_peers.put(peerName, ch) should be changed to _peers.put(peerName, ch1);
and also return ch1 instead of ch.
Thanks,
Bharat.
On 15-Apr-2015, at 12:21 pm, Marcus wrote:
> Is
