Re: [VPC RVR] - Refactor for Redundant Virtual Router Implementation

2014-10-08 Thread Wilder Rodrigues
No worriesŠ I think there won¹t be changes in the area we have touched. So, it won¹t create conflicts whilst merging. I will add another diagram to the wiki page, so it makes the bigger picture more visible. Thanks for taking this one. Cheers, Wilder On 08/10/14 09:44, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >

Re: [VPC RVR] - Refactor for Redundant Virtual Router Implementation

2014-10-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
On 08-Oct-2014, at 1:11 pm, Rohit Yadav wrote: > About the related PRs, we’re still in code freeze wrt 4.5.0 but we’ve still > not cut the branch for it yet. Does it make sense to include pending PRs to > master which are passing tests and have been reviewed? If not, should we cut > the 4.5 br

Re: [VPC RVR] - Refactor for Redundant Virtual Router Implementation

2014-10-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
Thanks for sharing this Wilder. About the related PRs, we’re still in code freeze wrt 4.5.0 but we’ve still not cut the branch for it yet. Does it make sense to include pending PRs to master which are passing tests and have been reviewed? If not, should we cut the 4.5 branch soon so these PRs a