Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 09 January 2015 13:31
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 (round #2)
+1
- Verified signature on a different computer
- Tested bunch of bash/deployment scripts
- Tested manual cases against 4.3.
iginal Message-
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: 09 January 2015 13:31
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 (round #2)
>>
>> +1
>>
>> - Verified signature
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 09 January 2015 13:31
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 (round #2)
>
> +1
>
> - Verified signature on a different computer
> - Tested bunch of ba
: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 09 January 2015 13:31
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1
+1
- Verified signature on a different computer
- Tested bunch of bash/deployment scripts
- Tested manual cases against 4.3.2/KVM and ACS 4.5 branch
On Friday 09 January 2015 04:23 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 5.3.1 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts up
for
Looks to just be presentation related:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/commit/7498aa58a2b5772e03e25f44a37907f915889ad8
ww.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: "Rohit Yadav"
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 9 January, 2015 10:16:13
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1
Hi all,
Thanks for your vote so far, a critical bug was found by Geoff H. and
fixed yesterday
g
> Sent: Friday, 9 January, 2015 10:16:13
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for your vote so far, a critical bug was found by Geoff H. and
> fixed yesterday and I've been testing. Due to this, I'm calling off the
&
Forgot to fix the URL:
Source release (checksums and signatures are available here):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-5.3.1/
> On 09-Jan-2015, at 4:23 pm, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 5.3.1 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts up
Hi all,
Thanks for your vote so far, a critical bug was found by Geoff H. and
fixed yesterday and I've been testing. Due to this, I'm calling off the
voting round and start another one.
On Tuesday 06 January 2015 10:46 PM, ilya musayev wrote:
+1 (binding), did basic testing all seems well..
On
+1 (binding), did basic testing all seems well..
On 1/2/15 3:13 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi,
Since a lot of people in the community are returning from holidays, please
consider testing and voting for 5.3.1.
As per our bylaws we will need at least 3 +1 PMC votes and no veteos, negative
vote to p
day, 6 January, 2015 11:30:58
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1
> Hi Lucian,
>
> Thanks for testing. Looks like you're using a very old version of
> requests (the library we use to make http calls). To check which version
> you're using, y
able_warnings()
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'disable_warnings'
What am I doing wrong?
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -
From: "Rohit Yadav"
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: T
ribute 'disable_warnings'
What am I doing wrong?
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -----
> From: "Rohit Yadav"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 6 January, 2015 08:35:23
> Subject: Re: [VOTE
Hi,
Please consider testing and voting for CloudMonkey 5.3.1, we’ve two +1
binding/PMC votes we need at least one more.
Any help is appreciated though please don’t vote without testing, it’s
important to ship a tested and stable product. Thanks.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBl
On Jan 4, 2015, at 2:22 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi Sebastien and Daan,
>
> Good suggestions, I would say the PMC should decide and update the wiki with
> tagging guidelines as necessary.
>
Actually Rohit you can do what you think is best :) creating a tag is certainly
something you can do.
Hi Sebastien and Daan,
Good suggestions, I would say the PMC should decide and update the wiki with
tagging guidelines as necessary.
Note: voting request did mention the git SHA and CloudMonkey’s branch model is
rather simple to locate/check it (one main branch - master).
> On 03-Jan-2015, at
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
some and then
> PS: it would be nice to tag git with a 5.3.1-tentative tag during voting...
May I sugest a tag like 5.3.1-RC20150101T? This way we can have
tags for multiple release candidates (stolen from the 4.4 release
procedure)
On Jan 2, 2015, at 4:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
>> On 03-Jan-2015, at 12:25 am, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> Releases can't be vetoed. You can vote -1, but it's a 'lazy majority'
>> vote not 'lazy consensus’
>
> Reading from http://cloudstack.apache.org/bylaws.html
>
> 3.2.1. Lazy Consensus -
> On 03-Jan-2015, at 12:25 am, David Nalley wrote:
>
> Releases can't be vetoed. You can vote -1, but it's a 'lazy majority'
> vote not 'lazy consensus’
Reading from http://cloudstack.apache.org/bylaws.html
3.2.1. Lazy Consensus - Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes and no
binding -1 vo
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since a lot of people in the community are returning from holidays, please
> consider testing and voting for 5.3.1.
>
> As per our bylaws we will need at least 3 +1 PMC votes and no veteos,
> negative vote to pass this, so the PMC is r
Hi,
Since a lot of people in the community are returning from holidays, please
consider testing and voting for 5.3.1.
As per our bylaws we will need at least 3 +1 PMC votes and no veteos, negative
vote to pass this, so the PMC is requested to participate as well (so far we’ve
one from Daan). T
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
...
> One question though, is there a known issue with the color coding? it
seems to change halfway through words in the output and not be
consistent in the help/error messages. Not a blocker and I may need to
read more but it loo
Hi Daan,
On Friday 19 December 2014 08:50 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi Daan,
On Friday 19 December 2014 07:23 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Rohit, I am testing against 4.4 simulator, I have tested against
master simulator. seems like I will +1 t
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi Daan,
>
> On Friday 19 December 2014 07:23 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>
>> Rohit, I am testing against 4.4 simulator, I have tested against
>> master simulator. seems like I will +1 this before the end of the day.
have now confirmed with 4.4^
Hi Daan,
On Friday 19 December 2014 07:23 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Rohit, I am testing against 4.4 simulator, I have tested against
master simulator. seems like I will +1 this before the end of the day.
Thanks for testing!
One question though, is there a known issue with the color coding? it
Rohit, I am testing against 4.4 simulator, I have tested against
master simulator. seems like I will +1 this before the end of the day.
One question though, is there a known issue with the color coding? it
seems to change halfway through words in the output and not be
consistent in the help/error
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 5.3.1 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts
> up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SHA:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master
> Co
;
> regards
> sadhu
>
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 3:50 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1
>
> On Dec 19, 2014, at 5:09 AM, Suresh Sadhu wrote:
>
>>
-VM]
> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to acquire lock on
> VMTemplateStoragePool: 96
>
Hi Suresh, it does not look like a cloudmonkey error. Are you testing 4.3.2, or
trying the new cloudmonkey to configure a DC ?
>
oudRuntimeException: Unable to acquire lock on
> VMTemplateStoragePool: 96
>
Hi Suresh, it does not look like a cloudmonkey error. Are you testing 4.3.2, or
trying the new cloudmonkey to configure a DC ?
>
> From: Rohit Yadav [rohit.ya...@s
on
VMTemplateStoragePool: 96
From: Rohit Yadav [rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 3:23 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1
Hi,
We're past the voting window now.
Hi,
We're past the voting window now. We'll wait indefinitely until we get
enough votes (as per bylaws for lazy consensus, at least 3 +1s) from our
PMC to pass this release.
Please test it before voting so as to avoid a bad release. Thanks.
On Thursday 18 December 2014 02:30 PM, Rohit Yadav wro
+1
- Manual QA against two different public CloudStack providers and
private deployment
- Testing by deploying a basic zone using bash script
(https://gist.github.com/bhaisaab/6b120bca5cbb4a2db732)
- Manual QA to test filtering against various display formats
On Monday 15 December 2014 11:40 AM,
34 matches
Mail list logo
