+1 binding
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 8:11 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
>
>
> On Nov 19, 2013, at 7:40 AM, Prasanna San
On Nov 19, 2013, at 7:40 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:27:57AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2013, at 11:43 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Took a while to run through the entire suite of tests.
>>>
>>> Improvements
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:27:57AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Nov 18, 2013, at 11:43 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Took a while to run through the entire suite of tests.
> >
> > Improvements in the results from 4.2.0 as well. 4.2.0 RC results are
> > at
On Nov 18, 2013, at 11:43 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Took a while to run through the entire suite of tests.
>
> Improvements in the results from 4.2.0 as well. 4.2.0 RC results are
> at http://markmail.org/message/fppeuounjs6fvxgy
>
> *Suggestions to improve the format o
+1 (binding)
Took a while to run through the entire suite of tests.
Improvements in the results from 4.2.0 as well. 4.2.0 RC results are
at http://markmail.org/message/fppeuounjs6fvxgy
*Suggestions to improve the format of the report welcome!
XenServer 6.2/ Test Run: #1059
Logs: http://goo.gl/
>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I have not signed up for Upgrade. I read in the ML it is going to be
>>>>taken up during the hackathon at Collab Conf.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow.
gt;
>>> I have not signed up for Upgrade. I read in the ML it is going to be
>>>taken up during the hackathon at Collab Conf.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, No
:shadow...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:45 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
>>
>> Sorry, that should read 'unable to create VPCs'.
>>
&g
taken up
> during the hackathon at Collab Conf.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:45 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudSt
Could someone please file a documentation bug on this issue ?
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 5:49 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
As long
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
Sorry, that should read 'unable to create VPCs'.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Yeah, I understand that 4.2.0 had a lot of post-release work needed.
>
> We are unable to create VPNs. This is report
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
+1 (binding) (with the assumption that we won't announce until after
docs are finished)
Verified sigs and
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 4:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
As long as we document the router reboot requirement in the release
k.apache.org
> Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
>
> Ok, that may be my fault as I've got various 4.2.0 systems built from testing
> various RCs. I just chose one and tried to upgrade it. Thanks for clearing
> that up.
>
> Anime
+1(binding)
Tested on my local dev setup with one Xen host and basic zone, marvin vm
test passed.
Thanks
-min
On 11/15/13 3:21 PM, "Edison Su" wrote:
>+1(binding)
>Tested on my local machine with one KVM host, basic marvin vm test passed.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Abhinandan Prat
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:42 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
Ok, that may be my fault as I've got various 4.2.0 systems
+1.
Did some basic testing like creating vms, attaching volume, creating
snapshots etc. and they all worked fine.
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 14/11/13 8:40 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>+1 binding (I had not been clear on this in this thread it seems)
>
>On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Abhinandan Pratee
+1(binding)
Tested on my local machine with one KVM host, basic marvin vm test passed.
> -Original Message-
> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:53 AM
> To: CloudStack Dev
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
>
Ok, that may be my fault as I've got various 4.2.0 systems built from
testing various RCs. I just chose one and tried to upgrade it. Thanks
for clearing that up.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
> Marcus,
>
> I am trying to understand the upgrade issue that you are fa
Marcus,
I am trying to understand the upgrade issue that you are facing.
It seems there were changes during various rounds of RC that we had for
4.2.0 .
The fix that you have mentioned in the email actually got introduced in
the 4.2 GA.
So someone upgrading to 4.2 GA will not have that constrai
Yes, I'd say that upgrade from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1 needs to work.
On Nov 14, 2013 5:58 PM, "David Nalley" wrote:
> Marcus:
>
> Is this is a -1?
>
> I don't have any legal concerns, and the release builds and tests for
> me (though I haven't tried VPC). I am somewhat concerned about what
> appears to
Is it possible that devs who missed the cutoff for 4.2 simply put it into
4.2.1? That is the feature was 90% done / tested, but missed.
On 11/14/13 4:58 PM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>Marcus:
>
>Is this is a -1?
>
>I don't have any legal concerns, and the release builds and tests for
>me (though I h
Marcus:
Is this is a -1?
I don't have any legal concerns, and the release builds and tests for
me (though I haven't tried VPC). I am somewhat concerned about what
appears to be drifting away from adhering to semver. (features appear
to have made it into the 4.2.1 release that weren't in 4.2.0) a
Sorry, that should read 'unable to create VPCs'.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Yeah, I understand that 4.2.0 had a lot of post-release work needed.
>
> We are unable to create VPNs. This is reported second hand from one
> of my admins. He seems to think that it was c
Yeah, I understand that 4.2.0 had a lot of post-release work needed.
We are unable to create VPNs. This is reported second hand from one
of my admins. He seems to think that it was caused by the following,
which added a for loop inside a for loop. The error is:
'com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.My
+1 binding (I had not been clear on this in this thread it seems)
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
> Marcus,
>
> Just summarising your concerns so that they can be followed upon:
> 1. Due to a VR script change a restart of VR is required. This should be
> noted down in
Marcus,
Just summarising your concerns so that they can be followed upon:
1. Due to a VR script change a restart of VR is required. This should be
noted down in upgrade instructions in RN. (Radhika to note)
2. For a maintenance release we should limit the scope to only blockers. I
guess what is
I'm unable to deploy virtual machines after upgrading an existing
4.2.0 to this release.
It looks like the file savepassword.sh was added at the end of October
as a virtual router script. This would likely mean that people
upgrading to 4.2.1 will need to upgrade/redeploy their routers. I can
verif
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
>
>This vote is to approve the current RC build for 4.2.1 maintenance release.
> For this particular release various upgrade paths have been tested apart from
> regression tests and BVTs.
> Around 175 bugs have been fixed some new fe
+1
I have deployed advanced zone with XenServer 6.2 host and system vms came
up with out any problem.
Tested following -
VM snapshot:
1. Deployed an instance and populated some data.
2. Took a snapshot.
3. Reverted the VM to the snapshot created in step2 and could see the data
that was present wh
well, mine is a go, I have a symptom not a decease.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
>
>
> On 13/11/13 7:14 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>
>>I tested 4.2.1 with our custom vpc gateway on nvp patch basic usage in
>>a adnvanced zone with niciranvp or with vlans work That me
On 13/11/13 7:14 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>I tested 4.2.1 with our custom vpc gateway on nvp patch basic usage in
>a adnvanced zone with niciranvp or with vlans work That means creating
>an standalone network or a vpc with a tier and in all cases with an
>instance being able to ping the outsi
I tested 4.2.1 with our custom vpc gateway on nvp patch basic usage in
a adnvanced zone with niciranvp or with vlans work That means creating
an standalone network or a vpc with a tier and in all cases with an
instance being able to ping the outside world. I encountered one
strange exception:
WARN
On 13/11/13 4:11 am, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:31:47PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>
>> The format of apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2.md5 doesn't match the
>>gpg output.
>>
>> See this:
>>
>> localhost :: /tmp/cloudstack >gpg --print-md MD5
>>apache-cloudsta
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:31:47PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
> The format of apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2.md5 doesn't match the gpg
> output.
>
> See this:
>
> localhost :: /tmp/cloudstack >gpg --print-md MD5
> apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2
> apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.t
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:34 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:52:54PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
>
>This v
Simon Weller wrote:
> The "list of changes" URL is returning a 404. It doesn't look like this has
> been branched yet.
>
>
>
> From: Chip Childers
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 2:40 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apa
The "list of changes" URL is returning a 404. It doesn't look like this has
been branched yet.
From: Chip Childers
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 2:40 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:33:51PM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:52:54PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
> >
> >This vote is to approve the current RC build for 4.2.1 maintenance
> > release.
> > For this particular release various upgrade paths have been tested ap
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:52:54PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
>
>This vote is to approve the current RC build for 4.2.1 maintenance release.
> For this particular release various upgrade paths have been tested apart from
> regression tests and BVTs.
> Around 175 bugs have been fixed som
40 matches
Mail list logo
