+1 (binding)
Performed some VM and volume life cycle tests manually on local and NFS
storages, in fresh installation (MS: Oracle Linux 8.6 + Hypervisor:
VMware/ESXi 7.0.3).
Regards,
Suresh
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 12:50 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a new RC for the 4.19.3
: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0 RC2
+1 (binding)
Tested on Ubuntu 24
some vm/network lifecycles
run smoke tests, etc
No major issues found
-Wei
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 9:20 AM Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a new RC for the 4.19.3.0 release, with
+1 (binding)
Tested on Ubuntu 24
some vm/network lifecycles
run smoke tests, etc
No major issues found
-Wei
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 9:20 AM Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a new RC for the 4.19.3.0 release, with the following
> artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Com
asic VM/network
> operations.
>
> Best wishes,
> Vladi
>
>
>
>
> From: Pearl Dsilva
> Sent: 30 May 2025 12:57
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0 RC2
>
> Hi All,
+1
Tested upgrades from 4.19.2 with VMware/KVM hypervisors, basic VM/network
operations.
Best wishes,
Vladi
From: Pearl Dsilva
Sent: 30 May 2025 12:57
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0 RC2
Hi All
: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0 RC2
+1 (binding)
Tested on vanilla Vmware + NFS environment:
* Template registration selecting ‘Read Instance settings from OVA’
* VPC deployment and operations
* VM lifecycle operations
* Created a test KVM cluster to verify the improvement
migration from external vCenter and existing vCenter
* CKS 1.27.8 cluster deployment
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
From: Rohit Yadav
Date: Monday, 2 June 2025 at 14:24
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ,
dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0 RC2
+1 (binding)
Did
+1 (binding)
Did a quick mbx env lifecycle test, LGTM.
Regards.
From: Bernardo De Marco Gonçalves
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2025 22:23
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0 RC2
+1, the following tests were
+1, the following tests were performed in a KVM + NFS environment:
- VMs lifecycle operations
- Environment logical segregation operations (e.g., management of domains,
accounts, users and projects)
- Kubernetes clusters lifecycle operations
- Volume snapshots operations
- Template registration fr
Hi All,
Convenience packages for 4.19.3.0 RC2 are available here:
http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.3.0-RC20250530T0908/
Regards,
Pearl
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 12:50 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a new RC for the 4.19.3.0 release, with the following
> artifacts
devs and users,
Harikrishna has found a fix for a small regression (thanks Hari) and
we will be including this in a new RC. Therefore I close the vote and
will create a new one.
regards
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 5:15 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.19.3.0 release, with the
Hmm no, I didn't upgrade from 4.20.
I just started 4.19 with java-17, and that ends in this weird error.
Anyway: *+1*
Linstor tests now run successfully!
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 2:18 PM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> never mind the noise Rene,
> it is a valid point, but in conclusion: the error was
never mind the noise Rene,
it is a valid point, but in conclusion: the error was due to
"upgrading" 4.20 to 4.19.3. no issue with the release so far then. (we
are sure to have another vote anyway)
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 2:12 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
>
> Hi Rene,
>
> Good point. You can create an issue
Hi Rene,
Good point. You can create an issue for improvement.
Kind regards,
Wei
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 2:02 PM Rene Peinthor
wrote:
> Sorry, for the noise. It turns out this is caused by using java-17, instead
> of java-11 for the 4.19 branch.
> Why can't there be easy to read errors for tha
Sorry, for the noise. It turns out this is caused by using java-17, instead
of java-11 for the 4.19 branch.
Why can't there be easy to read errors for that...
Will test now.
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:58 AM Rene Peinthor
wrote:
> yes there is a looong time between those 2 steps.
>
> But it turn
Rene,
You are saying this is an upgrade from 4.19.2?
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:13 AM Rene Peinthor wrote:
>
> VM's already thrown away, but they were completely fresh setups or lets say
> started from the 4.19.2.0 install (empty).
>
> I can recreate them if you want?
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at
Hi All,
For users convenience, the packages for this release candidate (RC1)
is available here:
http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.3.0-RC20250527T1642/
Regards,
Pearl Dsilva
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 8:46 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.19.3.0 release, with the
Kinda, from an empty database.
These are my install steps:
* create VM's
* install latest stable release of that branch 4.19.2
* run cloudstack-setup-databases script
* install systemvm template
* restart cloudstack-management
* install rc packages
* restart cloudstack-management
* BOOM
On Wed, M
yes there is a looong time between those 2 steps.
But it turns out, that already the 4.19.2.0 install is failing starting:
root@cs-120-mgmt:~# head -n 400
/var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log
2025-05-28 09:55:08,520 INFO [o.a.c.ServerDaemon] (main:null) (logid:)
Server configurat
Hi Rene,
Thanks for sharing.
I wonder if the mgmt server is started completely between the two steps
* restart cloudstack-management
* install rc packages
Kind regards,
Wei
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:29 AM Rene Peinthor
wrote:
> Kinda, from an empty database.
> These are my install steps
VM's already thrown away, but they were completely fresh setups or lets say
started from the 4.19.2.0 install (empty).
I can recreate them if you want?
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 10:52 AM Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Rene,
>
> The issue might be caused by some SQLException. Do you use a fresh
> installati
Hi Rene,
The issue might be caused by some SQLException. Do you use a fresh
installation or upgrade an existing environment?
Can you check if there are exceptions in the management-server.log ?
-Wei
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:17 AM Rene Peinthor
wrote:
> -1
> As I couldn't test, I tried buildi
thanks for the report Rene,
I see several GHA runs successful, but I'll try to deploy in a lab env
to see if I can reproduce your issue.
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:17 AM Rene Peinthor wrote:
>
> -1
> As I couldn't test, I tried building the mentioned branch and I wasn't able
> to start the managem
-1
As I couldn't test, I tried building the mentioned branch and I wasn't able
to start the management server.
I then tried the latest nightly build as I saw it is the same except for
the version number bump.
But also that build failed with the same error:
2025-05-28 06:36:34,778 WARN [o.a.c.s.m.
24 matches
Mail list logo
