On 03/20/2014 07:51 PM, Nux! wrote:
On 20.03.2014 18:48, Wido den Hollander wrote:
And it just went upstream! How great is that?
Pretty great. That's how open source works. :)
Quick question: there is no problem if instead of using NFS directly we
use the "shared mount point" option, is
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:51 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS
>
> On 20.03.2014 18:48, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >
> > And it
On 20.03.2014 18:48, Wido den Hollander wrote:
And it just went upstream! How great is that?
Pretty great. That's how open source works. :)
Quick question: there is no problem if instead of using NFS directly
we
use the "shared mount point" option, is it?
Probably not, since we would t
On 03/20/2014 05:38 PM, Nux! wrote:
On 19.03.2014 22:48, Edison Su wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 3:34 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS
On 19.03.2014 22:28, Edison Su
On 19.03.2014 22:48, Edison Su wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 3:34 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS
On 19.03.2014 22:28, Edison Su wrote:
Edison, if - with the workarounds
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 3:34 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS
>
> On 19.03.2014 22:28, Edison Su wrote:
> >> Edison, if - with the
On 19.03.2014 22:28, Edison Su wrote:
Edison, if - with the workarounds in place now - the current version
of KVM
works OK, then why wouldn't a newer version work just as fine?
Just trying to understand this.
That's a long story, there is a bug in Libvirt, which is introduced
in a newer versio
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 3:07 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS
>
> On 19.03.2014 20:29, Edison Su wrote:
> > It’s hard to find root
On 19.03.2014 20:29, Edison Su wrote:
It’s hard to find root cause and fix something in libvirt, even we
found the root cause, it's hard to push the fix into libvirt upstream,
and not to say push into downstream, like RHEL 6 etc. For example, we
already have a fix for the bug
https://bugzilla.red
lot of pain.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 12:35 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS
> >
> > On 19.03.2014 19:01, Wido den H
March 19, 2014 12:35 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS
>
> On 19.03.2014 19:01, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> > On 03/19/2014 07:54 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> >> I found many times in QA's testing environment, the li
On 19.03.2014 19:01, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 03/19/2014 07:54 PM, Edison Su wrote:
I found many times in QA's testing environment, the libvirt storage
pool(created on NFS) is missing on the kvm host frequently, for no
reason. It may relate to bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i
On 03/19/2014 07:54 PM, Edison Su wrote:
I found many times in QA's testing environment, the libvirt storage
pool(created on NFS) is missing on the kvm host frequently, for no reason. It
may relate to bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977706.
In order to fix this issue, and bug
13 matches
Mail list logo
