ect: Re: [Proposal] Switch to Java 7
>
> I would be in favor as well. In addition to the already discussed reasons, I
> think it would be good to try to get our users to a well maintained version of
> Java. From a security point of view 1.6 is not a smart choice any more.
>
> U
+1 for java 1.7
-Original Message-
From: Laszlo Hornyak [mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 4:50 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Switch to Java 7
+1 for java 1.7 and resource blocks, it will help to simplify
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014
+1 for java 1.7 and resource blocks, it will help to simplify
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> I would be in favor as well. In addition to the already discussed reasons,
> I think it would be good to try to get our users to a well maintained
> version of Java. From a sec
I would be in favor as well. In addition to the already discussed reasons, I
think it would be good to try to get our users to a well maintained version of
Java. From a security point of view 1.6 is not a smart choice any more.
Upgrading to Jdk 7 could also trigger an upgrade to tomcat 7. Best p
+1 for switching to Java 7 in CloudStack 4.4.
Kelven
On 1/6/14, 10:27 PM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote:
>Just to repeat what has been discussed some time ago.
>
>All the current Long Term Support distributions have Java 7 available.
>
>RHEL6, RHEL7, Ubuntu 12.04, Ubuntu 14.04 (due in April) will
Just to repeat what has been discussed some time ago.
All the current Long Term Support distributions have Java 7 available.
RHEL6, RHEL7, Ubuntu 12.04, Ubuntu 14.04 (due in April) will all have
Java 7 available.
I don't see a problem in switching to Java 7 with CloudStack 4.4 or 4.5
Wido
O
Java 7 is preferred for Apache Hadoop but not required
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopJavaVersions
(I was looking to see if other OSS projects had migrated)
--
Chiradeep
> On Jan 6, 2014, at 6:16 PM, "Ryan Lei" wrote:
>
> There was yet another similar discussion a half-year ago:
> http://m
There was yet another similar discussion a half-year ago:
http://markmail.org/thread/ap6v46r3mdsgdszp
---
Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Researcher
Cloud Computing Dept, Chunghwa Telecom Labs
ryan...@cht.com.tw
Yes, it is for the same reason, to management resource leaking in a better
way. Java 7 finally has added this long-waited language feature. I’ve been
using JRE 7 with CloudStack for a while and didn’t see any alerted issues.
Kelven
On 1/6/14, 3:34 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote:
>Yes, there was a
Yes, there was another discussion here:
http://markmail.org/thread/uf6bxab6u4z4fmrp
On 1/6/14 3:18 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote:
>Java 7 has been around for some time now. I strongly suggest CloudStack
>to adopt Java 7 as early as possible, the reason I feel like to raise the
>issue is from the som
10 matches
Mail list logo
