On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 03:07:39AM +, Edison Su wrote:
> Hi all,
> The second round, call for merge object_store branch into master, is
> coming!
> The issues fixed:
>1. All the major issues addressed by John are fixed:
> 1.1 A cache storage replacement
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 03:07:39AM +, Edison Su wrote:
> Hi all,
> The second round, call for merge object_store branch into master, is
> coming!
> The issues fixed:
>1. All the major issues addressed by John are fixed:
> 1.1 A cache storage replacement
Sure. Edison will start one soon with this context information.
Thanks
-min
On 6/3/13 10:33 AM, "John Burwell" wrote:
>Chip/Min,
>
>For thread 1, I would like to see an expanded discussion regarding the
>need for the staging area. In particular, what features on which
>hypervisors created the
Chip/Min,
For thread 1, I would like to see an expanded discussion regarding the need for
the staging area. In particular, what features on which hypervisors created
the need for it. With the wider expertise of the list, we may be able to find
solutions to these issues that either reduce or e
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:09:24PM +, Min Chen wrote:
> Chip/John,
>
> This thread has become very hard to follow due to several technical
> debates mixed together. Chip earlier made a good suggestion that we should
> start separate threads for several important architectural issues rais
-
>>>> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 7:43 AM
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>>>>
>>>> It feels like we have ju
ll [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 7:43 AM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>>>
>>> It feels like we have jumped to a solution without completely understanding
>
Comments inline:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:42:29PM +, Edison Su wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 7:43 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [M
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:42:29PM +, Edison Su wrote:
> And that's one of reason I don't care that much about the issue with nfs
> cache storage, couldn't we put our energy on cloud style storage solution,
> instead of on the un-scalable storage?
I'll try to think through your whole email a
> -Original Message-
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 7:43 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> Edison,
>
> Please see my comment in-line.
>
> Tha
t;>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 1:41 PM
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>>>>
>
child...@sungard.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 1:41 PM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:42:49PM +, Edison Su wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
che.org
>> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>>
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:42:49PM +, Edison Su wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
>>&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 1:41 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:42:49PM +
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:42:49PM +, Edison Su wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 8:43 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_s
> -Original Message-
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 8:43 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> All,
>
> I have gone a through a large chunk of this pat
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:42:56AM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
> All,
>
> I have gone a through a large chunk of this patch, and published my review
> thus far (https://reviews.apache.org/r/11277/). TL;DR is that this patch
> has a number of significant issues which can be summarized as follows
d, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:41PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>>>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May
;>>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:26 PM
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:41
ers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:26 PM
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:41PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi
branch into master
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:41PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:08 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
On Wed
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:10:25PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> [Animesh>] Plan means targeted for 4.2. Community review and technical
> quality are of course important and being attended to. The effort to find and
> fix issues with this change speaks for the attention to technical qualit
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:54 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> On May 24, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
>
> &g
On May 24, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:42 PM
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:42 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> On May 24, 2013, at 5:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
>
> &g
On May 24, 2013, at 5:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 1:18 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store bra
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 1:18 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 05:50:49PM +, Animesh Chaturved
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 05:50:49PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> [Animesh>] IMHO the goal behind bringing architectural changes early in
> release is to ensure stability and proper review and that makes sense. In
> this case the goals are being addressed with testing on feature branch and
at will be great!:)
> -Original Message-
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:56 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> Min,
>
> Yes, I feel that class needs to
gt; these
>>>>>> into a set of smaller patches submitted throughout the course of the
>>>>>> release cycle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So far, I can say I am very concerned about failure scenarios and
>>>>>> potential
ar, I can say I am very concerned about failure scenarios and
>>>>> potential race conditions around the NFS cache. However, I am only a
>>>>> quarter of the way through the code so my concerns may be resolved by
>>>>> the end of the process.
>>&
; the end of the process.
>>>>
>>>> I am also concerned about the correctness S3 implementation. Why did
>>>> you choose to directly access the S3 HTTP API rather using the client
>>>> library?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Joh
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 9:35 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:25:10PM +
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:25:10PM +, Edison Su wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:26 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_
gt; I am also concerned about the correctness S3 implementation. Why did
>>> you choose to directly access the S3 HTTP API rather using the client
>>> library?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -John
>>>
>>> On May 22, 2013, at 5:25 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>>>
>>&
>>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:41PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>>>>>> Sent: Wedne
;>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:26 PM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:41PM +, Animesh
2013 1:26 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>>
>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:41PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Chip Childers [
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:26 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:41PM +, Ani
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:26 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:41PM +, Ani
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:41PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:08 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [M
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:08 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:00:51PM +, Ani
22, 2013 at 07:00:51PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:51 AM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [MERGE]ob
sage-
>>> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:51 AM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>>>
>>> Edison,
>>>
>>> Thanks, I w
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:00:51PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:51 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [M
well [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:51 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>>
>> Edison,
>>
>> Thanks, I will start going through it today. Based on other $dayjob
>> respons
> -Original Message-
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:51 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> Edison,
>
> Thanks, I will start going through it tod
m]
>> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 2:30 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>>
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
>>> Sent: Monday
> -Original Message-
> From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 2:30 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joh
> -Original Message-
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 12:56 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> All,
>
> Since this change is so large, it makes reviewi
All,
Since this change is so large, it makes reviewing and commenting in detail
extremely difficult. Would it be possible to push this patch through Review
Board to ease comprehension and promote a conversation about this patch?
Reading through the FS, I have the following questions regarding
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 11:36 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti
> wrote:
> >
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti
wrote:
> Also open defects need to be addressed as testing has been done on feature
> branch and the numbers seem to be high on this branch - atleast blocker and
> critical should be addressed.
>
> Key Summary AssigneeReporter
ect_Store_Refactor - Templates - Not able to create
> a template from snapshot.Unassigned Sangeetha Hariharan
> CriticalOpen
+100 - known problems shouldn't be brought into master
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@su
ates - Not able to create a
template from snapshot.Unassigned Sangeetha Hariharan Critical
Open
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 10:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_st
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 08:19:57AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Edison Su wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Min and I worked on object_store branch during the last one and half
> > month. We made a lot of refactor on the storage code, mostly related to
> > secondary st
David and Edison,
I plan to review the branch, but due to a personal emergency, I won't have a my
feedback until COB, Monday.
Thanks,
-John
On May 17, 2013, at 8:19 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Edison Su wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Min and I worked on object_store
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Edison Su wrote:
> Hi all,
> Min and I worked on object_store branch during the last one and half
> month. We made a lot of refactor on the storage code, mostly related to
> secondary storage, but also on the general storage framework. The following
> goals
58 matches
Mail list logo
