Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2017-02-10 Thread Rajani Karuturi
I planning to create first RC end of feb(in 20 days). ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On February 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Daan Hoogland (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote: sorry to keep you guys waiting, I am struggling my way back in and am working on this (and a lot) will keep you

RE: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2017-02-10 Thread Daan Hoogland
sorry to keep you guys waiting, I am struggling my way back in and am working on this (and a lot) will keep you posted. @Rajani, what is the ETA that I must meet to get this in 4.10? daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.comĀ  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Utrecht Utrecht 3531 VENetherland

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2017-01-31 Thread Will Stevens
Sorry, been swamped. I need to fix our Jenkins to support Java 8 to be able to continue validation on Java 8. On Jan 31, 2017 1:48 AM, "rhtyd" wrote: > Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741 > > Ping, update on this? > > > --- > If yo

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2017-01-21 Thread Will Stevens
It is likely my environment. I had some connectivity issues in this envs when I was using them before. I have a pretty recent master in, but I can relate tonight to be sure. Can we kick off your CI to see what yours says? On Jan 21, 2017 2:24 AM, "PaulAngus" wrote: > Github user PaulAngus commen

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2017-01-03 Thread Will Stevens
I am going to try something today to see if I can try to find a way to support non-DH connections. I will let you know. On Jan 3, 2017 9:02 AM, "rhtyd" wrote: > Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741 > > @swill thanks, looking forward

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2017-01-03 Thread Will Stevens
I will do a final round of testing in the next couple days and squash the commits as you asked. Sorry for the delay. It has been running in prod for the last month or so and it is going well. Strongswan does not support leaving the DH group empty. Should I remove that as an option from the UI and