me process.
I see Rene has also raised more proposals about the development process, should
they be discussed on a separate thread?
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
From: Sven Vogel
Date: Friday, 23 May 2025 at 08:37
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Versioning
i
e others—PMCs, committers,
contributors, and users—to share their views.
Regards.
From: Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2025 19:44
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Versioning
Hello all,
Thanks for expanding the propos
n.
Lastly, the big question remains irrespective of what we vote on and what
guidelines get adopted — who's going to enforce them, ensure they are used and
followed, and for how long?
Regards.
From: João Jandre
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 22:22
To:
are their views.
Regards.
From: Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2025 19:44
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Versioning
Hello all,
Thanks for expanding the proposal, João.
I believe your proposal embraces a big portion of th
that soon.
Lastly, the big question remains irrespective of what we vote on and what
guidelines get adopted — who's going to enforce them, ensure they are used and
followed, and for how long?
Regards.
From: João Jandre
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 22:22
T
s get adopted — who's going to enforce them, ensure they are used and
followed, and for how long?
Regards.
____
From: João Jandre
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 22:22
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Versioning
Hello everyone,
Is anyone a
e's no scope for further
discussion I'll add my vote.
Thanks.
From: João Jandre
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 19:08
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Versioning
Hello Rohit,
> I think we need to break out the topics and discuss them separately.
Personally
Id=68720798
[3]: https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html
On 5/14/25 03:48, Rohit Yadav wrote:
I've made my position clear, if there's no scope for further discussion I'll
add my vote.
Thanks.
From: João Jandre
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 19:08
To:
I've made my position clear, if there's no scope for further discussion I'll
add my vote.
Thanks.
From: João Jandre
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 19:08
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Versioning
Hello Rohit,
> I thin
amp; security releases. The LTS/hypervisor support
is a good example and also optimisations, critical/security issues examples we've delivered
in past maintenance releases that required DB changes (both data & schema).
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS
[2] https://cwiki.apach
amples we've delivered in
past maintenance releases that required DB changes (both data &
schema).
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS
[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=68720798
Regards.
____
From: Jo
//cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=68720798
Regards.
________
From: João Jandre
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2025 00:19
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Versioning
Hello, Rohit
I'm very sorry to hear that your country is at war.
ntenance/minor & security releases.
Regards.
From: João Jandre
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 22:40
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Versioning
Hi everyone,
As it seems we have no objections to the proposed changes to our
versioning, I'll be starting a v
25 22:40
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Versioning
Hi everyone,
As it seems we have no objections to the proposed changes to our
versioning, I'll be starting a voting thread to vote on the changes to
the versioning process that were discussed on this thread.
Once the firs
Hi everyone,
As it seems we have no objections to the proposed changes to our
versioning, I'll be starting a voting thread to vote on the changes to
the versioning process that were discussed on this thread.
Once the first subject is decided (the process to follow and guide the
release proce
Hi Joao,
Thanks for bringing this back to discussion.
I largely agree with the proposed ideas and I think waiting for the
release after 4.21 should give us enough time to communicate this
properly. I agree with Daan's view about the transition not being that
big if we omit the 4. from the release
Hi Daan,
On 5/1/25 09:22, Daan Hoogland wrote:
The biggest reasons lately people have had to roll back afaics were
unforseen side effects of enhancements, not interface changes. That
doesn't negate the importance of being careful with breaking changes,
but as the one exception I think we must al
João,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 9:06 PM João Jandre wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to revisit the topic of versioning, particularly in light
> of our last discussion (see
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hnzp6hnsjyj8593cf6tbgryt1s8z5glq). It
> seems that most people here agree with the i
18 matches
Mail list logo
