> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 2:36 PM Nicolas Vazquez <
> nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > I don't have a preference either, but the work you are proposing
on your
> > PR makes sense to me.
> >
> >
M Nicolas Vazquez <
> > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > I don't have a preference either, but the work you are proposing
> on your
> > > PR makes sense to me.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I don't have a preference either, but the work you are proposing on your
> > PR makes sense to me.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Nicolas Vazquez
> >
> >
> > From: Rohit
peblue.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > I don't have a preference either, but the work you are proposing on your
> > PR makes sense to me.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Nicolas Vazquez
> >
> > _
t; PR makes sense to me.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nicolas Vazquez
>
>
> From: Rohit Yadav
> Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 5:05 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discussion] String libs
>
> I don't have any specific
Hi Daniel,
I don't have a preference either, but the work you are proposing on your PR
makes sense to me.
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 5:05 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] S
I don't have any specific inclination, I would use whatever becomes a standard.
However, I prefer the readability of a utility method that is readable and easy
to understand such as isNullOrEmpty (which suggests it's doing a null check)
versus isEmpty.
I suppose a refactoring exercise can be do
