Never mind. Found the problem, we also need to pass -Dnoredist flag in
starting MS.
Thanks
-min
On 11/5/13 4:54 PM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>CC Darren here, in case that he knows something about recent change on
>handling commands.properties in nonoss build.
>
>Thanks
>-min
>
>On 11/5/13 4:49 PM, "Mi
CC Darren here, in case that he knows something about recent change on
handling commands.properties in nonoss build.
Thanks
-min
On 11/5/13 4:49 PM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>I saw that vmware plugin is built with -Dnoredist option. But this
>particular vmware API addVmwareDc is not working on master,
I saw that vmware plugin is built with -Dnoredist option. But this
particular vmware API addVmwareDc is not working on master, so blocking
Vmware testing. Anybody encountered this issue?
Thanks
-min
On 11/5/13 4:43 PM, "Will Stevens" wrote:
>From what I can tell it is in. I have figured out how
>From what I can tell it is in. I have figured out how to change my plugin
from nonoss by looking at other code in master.
Ws
On Tuesday, November 5, 2013, Min Chen wrote:
> Is this change already in master? I tried to do a clean build on master
> using
>
> mvn clean install -Pdeveloper,systemvm
Is this change already in master? I tried to do a clean build on master
using
mvn clean install -Pdeveloper,systemvm -Dnoredist
But then deploying a vmware zone failed with the following error:
2013-11-05 16:25:36,056 WARN [c.c.a.ApiServer]
(1039076426@qtp-184764793-9:ctx-de0a2b48 ctx-4f586e61)
Did this get documented anywhere? It seems that the core build as well as
the nonoss build got changed. I am having trouble locating the beans
now...
Thanks,
Will
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Rajesh Battala
wrote:
> +1.
> Sounds great and logical.
>
> On mvn cmd line instead of -Dnonoss
+1.
Sounds great and logical.
On mvn cmd line instead of -Dnonoss we should be using -Dnoredist right!
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Monday, September 2, 2013 5:56 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DIS
Sounds like a good idea!
Any chances of modifying the packaging script to signify that it is a
noredist build?
On 3 September 2013 19:35, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> Agreed. There can be GPL stuff in noredist :)
>
> On 9/2/13 5:25 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote:
>
> >Hey,
> >
> >Does anybody mind if
Agreed. There can be GPL stuff in noredist :)
On 9/2/13 5:25 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote:
>Hey,
>
>Does anybody mind if I rename all mentions (that I can find) of "nonoss"
>to "noredist". This will actually reflect what is in the "nonoss" build,
>it has nothing to do with opensource, but all with
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2013 5:26 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] rename nonoss to noredist
>
> Hey,
>
> Does anybody mind if I rename all mentions (that I can find) of "nono
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:25:58PM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Does anybody mind if I rename all mentions (that I can find) of "nonoss" to
> "noredist". This will actually reflect what is in the "nonoss" build, it has
> nothing to do with opensource, but all with redistribution of bi
11 matches
Mail list logo