compatibility with existing code.
From: Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 4:04 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DIS
ted out, we have a lot of cleanup to do :-) It
>>> certainly makes it a lot easier though when you're not breaking
>>> compatibility with existing code.
>>>
>>> ____________
>>> From: Rohit Yadav
>
tainly makes it a lot easier though when you're not breaking
>>> compatibility with existing code.
>>>
>>> ________________
>>> From: Rohit Yadav
>>> Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 4:04 AM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>&
Yadav
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 4:04 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] API versioning
+1 Good idea, though bear in mind there are 500+ APIs with no
modern-RESTful-standardization, a lot of work.
Regards.
From: Nitin Kumar Maharana
Sent: 05
: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] API versioning
+1 Good idea, though bear in mind there are 500+ APIs with no
modern-RESTful-standardization, a lot of work.
Regards.
From: Nitin Kumar Maharana
Sent: 05 June 2017 12:37:24
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subjec
though when you're not breaking
> > compatibility with existing code.
> >
> >
> > From: Rohit Yadav
> > Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 4:04 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: R
> certainly makes it a lot easier though when you're not breaking
> > compatibility with existing code.
> >
> >
> > From: Rohit Yadav
> > Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 4:04 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subj
have a lot of cleanup to do :-) It
> certainly makes it a lot easier though when you're not breaking
> compatibility with existing code.
>
>
> From: Rohit Yadav
> Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 4:04 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Su
e.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] API versioning
+1 Good idea, though bear in mind there are 500+ APIs with no
modern-RESTful-standardization, a lot of work.
Regards.
From: Nitin Kumar Maharana
Sent: 05 June 2017 12:37:24
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DI
+1 Good idea, though bear in mind there are 500+ APIs with no
modern-RESTful-standardization, a lot of work.
Regards.
From: Nitin Kumar Maharana
Sent: 05 June 2017 12:37:24
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] API versioning
This looks good
This looks good. +1
> On 04-Jun-2017, at 2:34 PM, Rene Moser wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I recently developed ansible modules for the ACL API and ... found this
> has a really inconsistent API naming. E.g.
>
> createNetworkACL <<-- this creates an ACL rule
> createNetworkACLList <<-- this create the ACL
>
>
+1
boris.stoya...@shapeblue.comÂ
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
> On Jun 4, 2017, at 7:15 PM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote:
>
> This sounds like a good idea to me.
>
>> On Jun 4, 2017, at 8:24 AM, Will Stevens wrote:
>>
>> +1. I like it.
>>
This sounds like a good idea to me.
> On Jun 4, 2017, at 8:24 AM, Will Stevens wrote:
>
> +1. I like it.
>
>> On Jun 4, 2017 5:04 AM, "Rene Moser" wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I recently developed ansible modules for the ACL API and ... found this
>> has a really inconsistent API naming. E.g.
>>
>
+1. I like it.
On Jun 4, 2017 5:04 AM, "Rene Moser" wrote:
> Hi
>
> I recently developed ansible modules for the ACL API and ... found this
> has a really inconsistent API naming. E.g.
>
> createNetworkACL <<-- this creates an ACL rule
> createNetworkACLList <<-- this create the ACL
>
> updateNe
14 matches
Mail list logo
