On 12/01/2014 09:16 PM, Logan Barfield wrote:
> Sounds good. I've been running this in production since July without any
> issues, so it shouldn't conflict with anything that I'm aware of.
>
> Wido, if you can respond here once it's in I'd appreciate it.
>
I see no problem in merging this int
Much appreciated Rohit.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Logan,
>
> > On 01-Dec-2014, at 11:57 pm, Logan Barfield
> wrote:
> >
> > 3a52a83faeaa72a8488b2db1253fef6d3308d708
>
> Thanks for raising this, looks like it was not mer
Hi Logan,
> On 01-Dec-2014, at 11:57 pm, Logan Barfield wrote:
>
> 3a52a83faeaa72a8488b2db1253fef6d3308d708
Thanks for raising this, looks like it was not merged into 4.5 at all. I’ve
cherry-picked this on 4.5; commit 3a36681b6edbf317ef75ca96acb24522ca341556
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Archi
Sounds good. I've been running this in production since July without any
issues, so it shouldn't conflict with anything that I'm aware of.
Wido, if you can respond here once it's in I'd appreciate it.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:08 PM, David Nalley wro
No that worksforme.
I'd prefer that Wido move this over, so that he can ensure that it's
not going to break anything else.
--David
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> mail this list with the tag acs45, kind of how you did it.
>
> @david Or do you prefer a different approach?
>
mail this list with the tag acs45, kind of how you did it.
@david Or do you prefer a different approach?
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Logan Barfield wrote:
> I don't know what the current procedure is for this, but I'd like to
> get 3a52a83faeaa72a8488b2db1253fef6d3308d708
> from master in th
