gt;
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@accelerite.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 2:06 PM
>> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: Xenserver 6.5 live migration with local volumes
;
>>>>>> On 24/06/16, 2:33 AM, "Dave Garbus" wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there anybody that wants to take this on?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Dave
gt;>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> - Dave
>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 24, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Dave Garbus
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I updated the issue referenced in this email (
>>>> https://issues.
t get someone
> >> assigned to it, that’d be a good start.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> - Dave
> >>>>
> >>>> On May 24, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Ivan Derbenev <
> >> ivan.derbe...@tech-corps.com<
n Derbenev <
>> ivan.derbe...@tech-corps.com<mailto:ivan.derbe...@tech-corps.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way I can fix this on my installation, without recompiling
>> jar files?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> IT engineer
&g
recompiling jar
>> files?
>>
>> Regards,
>> IT engineer
>> Farheap, Russia
>> Ivan Derbenev
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@accelerite.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 2:06 PM
>> To: us...@cloudstack
k Das [mailto:koushik@accelerite.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 2:06 PM
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Xenserver 6.5 live migration with local volumes
>
> This is a product bug and needs to be fixed. There is some serializati
>
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Matthew Midgett
>>> wrote:
>>>> And where exactly do we stand with this right now? Can I install with
>>> ACS 4.5?
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Daan Hoogland [m
ssage-
>> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:17 AM
>> > To: dev
>> > Subject: Re: xenserver 6.5
>> >
>> > Adrian, I think your questions/considerations are right and I have been
>>
s right now? Can I install with
> ACS 4.5?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:17 AM
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: xenserver 6.5
> >
> > Adrian, I think your
4, 2015 3:17 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: xenserver 6.5
>
> Adrian, I think your questions/considerations are right and I have been
> wondering about the same things.
> On one side it should be "allowed unless" instead of "only allowed if". On
> the other han
And where exactly do we stand with this right now? Can I install with ACS 4.5?
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:17 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: xenserver 6.5
Adrian, I think your questions/considerations are right and
dle XS6.5 but the
> validation code says it can't, isn’t this is a bug?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Adrian
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 20 October 2014 20:10
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: xenser
fact handle XS6.5 but the
validation code says it can't, isn’t this is a bug?
Cheers,
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 October 2014 20:10
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: xenserver 6.5
Correct on both counts
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014
; Andrei
>
> - Original Message -
>
>> From: "Pierre-Luc Dion"
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, 29 December, 2014 5:44:56 PM
>> Subject: Re: XenServer 6.5 RC and ACS
>
>> Hi Andrei,
>
>> I haven't tested it but
Sorry, I do not have a lab to test.
Could someone verify if 4.4 supports XenServer 6.5 please?
Thanks
Andrei
- Original Message -
> From: "Pierre-Luc Dion"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 29 December, 2014 5:44:56 PM
> Subject: Re: XenServe
It's in master since September, and I think 4.5, but haven't explicitly
tried that.
On Dec 29, 2014 12:47 PM, "Pierre-Luc Dion" wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> I haven't tested it but it might work with ACS 4.4. do you have a lab to
> validate this ? their is reference to XS6.5 into the code which is why
Hi Andrei,
I haven't tested it but it might work with ACS 4.4. do you have a lab to
validate this ? their is reference to XS6.5 into the code which is why I'm
expecting to have it working with 4.4.
Cheers,
PL
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> Is t
t; > > Out of interest, on the assumption that there are no issues
> with
> > > > using
> > > > > > 6.5
> > > > > > > when it's released and there are no backwards-compatibility
> > > problems,
> > > > > > will
> >
> > > > > will
> > > > > > it then work with 4.4.1 or does CS need to be *explicitly* told
> > that
> > > > > newer,
> > > > > > effectively unknown versions are 'acceptable' as a valid
> > hypervisor?
> &
id
> hypervisor?
> > > > > Basically, If we deploy CS 4.4.1 and we like the look of XS 6.5
> when
> > it
> > > > > comes out, will we need to make any changes to CS to start using
> it?
> > If
> > > > so,
> > > > > are thes
ing it?
> If
> > > so,
> > > > are these simple edits to the contents of a file or would it require
> > > > rebuilding?
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com
> ]
>
to the contents of a file or would it require
> > > rebuilding?
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com ]
> > > Sent: 20 October 2014 15:28
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> &g
le or would it require
> > rebuilding?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com ]
> > Sent: 20 October 2014 15:28
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: xenserver 6.5
> >
> > I
t using it? If so,
> are these simple edits to the contents of a file or would it require
> rebuilding?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com ]
> Sent: 20 October 2014 15:28
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: xen
rt using it? If so,
> are these simple edits to the contents of a file or would it require
> rebuilding?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 20 October 2014 15:28
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: xenserve
lto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com]
Sent: 20 October 2014 15:28
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: xenserver 6.5
I think it should be minimal, because although there are large internal
changes (e.g., 3.x kernel, 64-bit dom0, new Xen, new storage datapath, PVHVM
mode for RHEL/CentOS 7), the interface
-
From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 7:28 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: xenserver 6.5
I think it should be minimal, because although there are large internal changes
(e.g., 3.x kernel, 64-bit dom0, new Xen, new storage datapath
I think it should be minimal, because although there are large internal changes
(e.g., 3.x kernel, 64-bit dom0, new Xen, new storage datapath, PVHVM mode for
RHEL/CentOS 7), the interface is essentially unchanged.
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.h
29 matches
Mail list logo
