a cluster basis.
Simon Weller/ENA
(615) 312-6068
-Original Message-
From: Will Stevens [wstev...@cloudops.com]
Received: Friday, 09 Sep 2016, 5:46PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org [dev@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
trol your storage failure domains on a cluster basis.
>>>
>>> Simon Weller/ENA
>>> (615) 312-6068
>>>
>>> -Original Message-----
>>> From: Will Stevens [wstev...@cloudops.com]
>>> Received: Friday, 09 Sep 2016, 5:46PM
>>>
uster basis.
>>
>> Simon Weller/ENA
>> (615) 312-6068
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Will Stevens [wstev...@cloudops.com]
>> Received: Friday, 09 Sep 2016, 5:46PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org [dev@cloudstack.apache.org]
>> Subject: Re: storag
s [wstev...@cloudops.com]
> Received: Friday, 09 Sep 2016, 5:46PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org [dev@cloudstack.apache.org]
> Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
>
> I have not really thought through this use case, but off the top of my
> head, you MAY be able to do something like use h
[dev@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
I have not really thought through this use case, but off the top of my
head, you MAY be able to do something like use host anti-affinity and then
use different primary storage per host affinity. I know this is not the
ideal solution
mail.com on behalf
> of Will Stevens
> Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 12:44 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
>
> My understanding is that he wants to do anti-affinity across primary
> storage endpoints. So if he
stands, I believe you will need to resort
to storage tagging for your use case then.
From: Yiping Zhang
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 1:44 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
Will described m
With CloudStack as it currently stands, I believe you will need to resort to
storage tagging for your use case then.
From: Yiping Zhang
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 1:44 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
Will
1) storage tagging 2)
fault-tolerant primary storage like a SAN.
From: williamstev...@gmail.com on behalf of Will
Stevens
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 12:44 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
9, 2016 12:44 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
My understanding is that he wants to do anti-affinity across primary
storage endpoints. So if he has two web servers, it would ensure that one
of his web servers is on Primary1 and the other is on Primary2. This
> highly fault tolerant. If the SAN is offline, then it probably means your
> entire datacenter is offline (ex. power loss of some sort).
>
> Talk to you later,
> Mike
>
> From: Yiping Zhang
> Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 11:08
offline, then it probably means your entire
datacenter is offline (ex. power loss of some sort).
Talk to you later,
Mike
From: Yiping Zhang
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 11:08 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
I
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 6:27 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: storage affinity groups
So what would be the best way to do it? I use templates to make it simple
for my users so that the Xen tools are already installed as an example.
Regards,
Ma
.
From: Marty Godsey
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 6:27 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: storage affinity groups
So what would be the best way to do it? I use templates to make it simple for
my users so that the Xen tools are already installed as an example.
Regards,
Marty Godsey
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
Well, using tags leads to proliferation of templates or service offerings etc.
It is not very scalable and gets out of hand very quickly.
Yiping
On 9/8/16, 4:25 PM, "Marty Godsey" wrote:
I do this by using storage tags. As
: Thursday, September 8, 2016 7:16 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
If one doesn't already exist, you can write a custom storage allocator to
handle this scenario.
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Yiping Zhang wrote:
-
From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 7:16 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
If one doesn't already exist, you can write a custom storage allocator to
handle this scenario.
> On Sep 8, 2016, at
If one doesn't already exist, you can write a custom storage allocator to
handle this scenario.
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Yiping Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi, Devs:
>
> We all know how (anti)-host affinity group works in CloudStack, I am
> wondering if there is a similar concept for (anti)-stora
18 matches
Mail list logo
