RE: marvin cloudstackConnection init

2014-05-16 Thread Santhosh Edukulla
If we are referring to scheme argument related to http\https, there was one more argument, passed i.e., mgmtDetails structure which serves this purpose and so removed it. Santhosh From: Daan Hoogland [daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 201

Re: marvin cloudstackConnection init

2014-05-16 Thread Daan Hoogland
No I mean you replaced the individual arguments with a mgmtDetails structure, did you describe this change somewhere? On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > If we are referring to scheme argument related to http\https, there was one > more argument, passed i.e., mgmtDetails

RE: marvin cloudstackConnection init

2014-05-16 Thread Santhosh Edukulla
them. Santhosh From: Daan Hoogland [daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 4:09 AM To: Santhosh Edukulla Cc: Girish Shilamkar; dev Subject: Re: marvin cloudstackConnection init No I mean you replaced the individual arguments with a mgmtDetails

Re: marvin cloudstackConnection init

2014-05-16 Thread Daan Hoogland
4 4:09 AM > To: Santhosh Edukulla > Cc: Girish Shilamkar; dev > Subject: Re: marvin cloudstackConnection init > > No I mean you replaced the individual arguments with a mgmtDetails > structure, did you describe this change somewhere? > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Santho