omesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 9:26 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: delete local storage pool on cloudstack 4.4.3
Can you take a peek int
; Dear Mike,
> > >
> > > I update the storage pool remove time with timestamp，but it can not
> > > load the whole information in "Inforastructure" . I rollback the
> > > update and it is ok.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Star Guo
&
ot
> > load the whole information in "Inforastructure" . I rollback the
> > update and it is ok.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Star Guo
> >
> > -邮件原件-
> > 发件人: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
>
t; > Star Guo
> >
> > -邮件原件-
> > 发件人: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> > 发送时间: 2015年5月13日 5:43
> > 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > 主题: Re: delete local storage pool on cloudstack 4.4.3
> >
> > Sounds like a bug perh
kowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> 发送时间: 2015年5月13日 5:43
> 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> 主题: Re: delete local storage pool on cloudstack 4.4.3
>
> Sounds like a bug perhaps, but you could always manually update the
> cloud.storage_pool table to mark it as removed.
&
Star Guo
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> 发送时间: 2015年5月13日 5:43
> 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> 主题: Re: delete local storage pool on cloudstack 4.4.3
>
> Sounds like a bug perhaps, but you could always manually update the
>
t;Inforastructure" . I rollback the update and it
> is ok.
>
> Best Regards,
> Star Guo
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> 发送时间: 2015年5月13日 5:43
> 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> 主题: Re: delete local storage pool on clo
3
收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: Re: delete local storage pool on cloudstack 4.4.3
Sounds like a bug perhaps, but you could always manually update the
cloud.storage_pool table to mark it as removed.
If you have successfully removed primary storage in the past, you could
probably use that as
Sounds like a bug perhaps, but you could always manually update the
cloud.storage_pool table to mark it as removed.
If you have successfully removed primary storage in the past, you could
probably use that as an example row for how to update the applicable row
remotely.
On Tuesday, May 12, 2015,
