Re: assignVirtualMachine API fails

2013-05-22 Thread Ashutosh Kelkar
Thanks Prasanna, Likitha. I have fixed the VM create call in tests. Now test for VM without PF rule are working for assignVirtualMachine. ./Ashu On 22-May-2013, at 7:47 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > If you used VirtualMachine.create from base.py then the PF rule would > be implicitly created

Re: assignVirtualMachine API fails

2013-05-22 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
If you used VirtualMachine.create from base.py then the PF rule would be implicitly created for you. Is that the case? On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:44:13PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote: > +Ashutosh. > > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Likitha Shetty > wrote: > > > Girish, > > > > ** ** >

Re: assignVirtualMachine API fails

2013-05-22 Thread Girish Shilamkar
+Ashutosh. On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Likitha Shetty wrote: > Girish, > > ** ** > > I am not able to reproduce this on master. Can you double check if port > forwarding has not been set on the VM? > > And if a PF rule has been configured then it is the expected behavior. > > *

RE: assignVirtualMachine API fails

2013-05-22 Thread Likitha Shetty
Girish, I am not able to reproduce this on master. Can you double check if port forwarding has not been set on the VM? And if a PF rule has been configured then it is the expected behavior. Thanks, Likitha From: Girish Shilamkar [mailto:gir...@clogeny.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:40 PM