Re: Windows support for KVM

2013-11-18 Thread Marcus Sorensen
t;> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Edison Su wrote: >> >>> Certain Windows server hard code on how many sockets it supports: >>> http://www.openwebit.com/c/how-to-run-windows-vm-on-more-than-2-cores-under-kvm/ >>> >>> &g

Re: Windows support for KVM

2013-11-18 Thread Marcus Sorensen
n how many sockets it supports: >> http://www.openwebit.com/c/how-to-run-windows-vm-on-more-than-2-cores-under-kvm/ >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] >> > Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013

Re: Windows support for KVM

2013-11-18 Thread Arnaud Gaillard
: > http://www.openwebit.com/c/how-to-run-windows-vm-on-more-than-2-cores-under-kvm/ > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 1:53 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Su

RE: Windows support for KVM

2013-11-18 Thread Edison Su
> -Original Message- > From: Arnaud Gaillard [mailto:arnaud.gaill...@xtendsys.net] > Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 6:56 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Windows support for KVM > > Hello, > > A few days ago I created a new Jira ticket for the support of topology in > netw

RE: Windows support for KVM

2013-11-18 Thread Edison Su
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Windows support for KVM > > I don't really understand the issue. > What is the difference between > 8 > > and > > 1 > > > > > Why does Windows see only 4 cores in the first case? Is it because the 8 >

Re: Windows support for KVM

2013-11-18 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
I don't really understand the issue. What is the difference between 8 and 1 Why does Windows see only 4 cores in the first case? Is it because the 8 cores are split across physical sockets? On 11/18/13 6:55 AM, "Arnaud Gaillard" wrote: >Hello, > >A few days ago I created a new Jira t