> On 8/19/13 6:40 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kind of on that same vein:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyone interested in modifying the KVM agent to support "pure" Xen
>&g
t;>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think it might be possible to just use the kvm agent and modify the
>>>>>>> libvirt calls to talk to xl , that way there would be no need for
>>>>>>> xapi...
>>>>>>>
mages in secondary
>>>>>>>> storage to
>>>>>>>> the hypervisor?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3. What will be your primary storage model? Typically, primary
>>>>>>>>> storage is
>>>>>>>
Which if I am not mistaken would give us Xen on ARM support instantly
>>>>> in
>>>>> CloudStack
>>>>>
>>>>> Any takers ? or anyone telling me I got this completely wrong ?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Sebastien
>>>>&g
s Xen on ARM support instantly
>>>> in
>>>> CloudStack
>>>>
>>>> Any takers ? or anyone telling me I got this completely wrong ?
>>>>
>>>> -Sebastien
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 16, 2013, at 2:42 AM,
;> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ian, with AWS it¹s the other way around. The package allows us to spin
>>>> up VMs in CS using AWS EC2 API's.
>>>>
>>>> -Likitha
>>>>
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From:
S it¹s the other way around. The package allows us to spin
>>> up VMs in CS using AWS EC2 API's.
>>>
>>> -Likitha
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie]
>>>> Sent: Friday, August 1
nal Message-----
>>> From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie]
>>> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 12:07 PM
>>> To: CloudStack Dev
>>> Subject: Re: Whats involved in adding an extra hypervisor
>>>
>>> Hi Donal and Chiradeep,
>>>
>>>
2013/8/19 Sebastien Goasguen
> Kind of on that same vein:
>
> Anyone interested in modifying the KVM agent to support "pure" Xen without
> xapi.
>
> I think it might be possible to just use the kvm agent and modify the
> libvirt calls to talk to xl , that way there would be no need for xapi...
>
#x27;s.
>
> -Likitha
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie]
>> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 12:07 PM
>> To: CloudStack Dev
>> Subject: Re: Whats involved in adding an extra hypervisor
>>
>> Hi Donal an
h command can be found out from
>existing hypervisor implementations. Alternatively, you can look at test logs,
>which contain the data from each command. Eventually you'll want to try your
>plugin with CloudStack itself.
>>
>> Chiradeep's comments relate to #6 above.
>
data from each command. Eventually you'll want to
> try your plugin with CloudStack itself.
>
> Chiradeep's comments relate to #6 above.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: 15 August 2013 02
to #6 above.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 15 August 2013 02:51
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Whats involved in adding an extra hypervisor
>
> Yes, it is a hypervisor plugin. While the exten
Yes, it is a hypervisor plugin. While the extension method may be simple,
the impedance mismatch between the CloudStack virtual model and the
hypervisor API is what causes the most pain.
E.g., CloudStack will hand a VirtualMachineTO object (consisting of
cpu/mem/nic) and then you have to use the hy
14 matches
Mail list logo
