> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 04 July 2013 17:10
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: aemne...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic
>
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:21:55AM +, Ra
+1 - let us not remove them. If they are not suitable for BVT, include them in
regression suite.
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2013 3:09 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic
why would
d Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 04 July 2013 15:39
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic
> >
> > why would we remove these cases and not find the root cause, if there is an
> > issue, and fixing that.
>
This could happen if there is a stickiness policy configured on the LB rule.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 04 July 2013 15:39
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic
>
> why would
why would we remove these cases and not find the root cause, if there is an
issue, and fixing that.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some of the BVT test cases verify if load balancing rule set to round
> robin is working or not.
> It is seen that often LBing
