e from your listing
> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski
> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:21:27
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:16:15 -0700
> > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> > From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >
> > If you look in the vm_template table in the cloud DB, you should be able
> to
> > find a URL for that template.
>
12:16:15 -0700
> > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> > From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >
> > If you look in the vm_template table in the cloud DB, you should be able
> to
> > find a URL for that template.
> >
> >
Gotcha, thought about trying to upload my own template or iso to see how that
worked..
> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:16:15 -0700
> Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
> If you look in the vm_template table in the cl
If you look in the vm_template table in the cloud DB, you should be able to
find a URL for that template.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Michael Phillips
wrote:
> How would you go about manually downloading it?
>
> > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:05:20 -0700
> > Subject:
How would you go about manually downloading it?
> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:05:20 -0700
> Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
> Have you tried manually downloading it (outside of CloudStack) to see if
> that
nloaded to has 44GB of free
> space.
>
> > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:34:18 -0700
> > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> > From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >
> > I believe I had trouble with that in my development environment
Any idea why the default centos5.3 template would be "stuck" downloading at
88%??
The secondary storage where it is getting downloaded to has 44GB of free space.
> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:34:18 -0700
> Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> From: mike.tutkow...@soli
would need
multiple mount points such as /mnt/sec, /mnt/sec1, /mnt/sec2...I'm guessing
that the most painless scenario is to just use one HUGE secondary storage and
be done with it.
> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:34:18 -0700
> Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire
see what setting made it kick in...Stay tuned...
>> > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:40:13 -0700
>> > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
>> > From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >
>> > So, just curious here, but w
g the system VMs. So I am trying to back track
> and see what setting made it kick in...Stay tuned...
> > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:40:13 -0700
> > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> > From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >
> > So
t this was not documented anywhere unless I missed it...
> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:40:13 -0700
> Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
> So, just curious here, but why wouldn't the ESX(i) host simply be able to
I am trying to back track and see what
setting made it kick in...Stay tuned...
> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:40:13 -0700
> Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
> So, just curious here, but why wouldn't the ESX(i) host
-
> >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> >> > Sent: 21 February 2014 09:54
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> >> >
> >> > Yes, the hypervisor do
: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
>> > Sent: 21 February 2014 09:54
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
>> >
>> > Yes, the hypervisor does need to mount the NFS share, but I seem to
>> remember the
rm. So I can only guess that something is up
> with the newer versions of CS with Centos
>
> > Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:24:07 -0700
> > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> > From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >
> > Yes, the
inal Message-
> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> > Sent: 21 February 2014 09:54
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> >
> > Yes, the hypervisor does need to mount the NFS share, but I seem to
> remember the
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: 21 February 2014 09:54
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
>
> Yes, the hypervisor does need to mount the NFS share, but I seem to remember
> there
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: 21 February 2014 09:59
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: VMware and NFS
>
> h.I have been scoring docs etcit would not surprise me...
> Can any
with Centos
> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:24:07 -0700
> Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
> Yes, the hypervisor does need to mount the NFS share, but I seem to
> remember there being something unusual abo
> > Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 19:43:32 -0700
> > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> > From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >
> > I may be remembering this incorrectly, but for VMware doesn't the
> > management serve
right?
> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 19:43:32 -0700
> Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
> I may be remembering this incorrectly, but for VMware doesn't the
> management server have to be able to mount the secondary
Yes to both...
> From: nitin.me...@citrix.com
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:39:01 +
>
> Couple of questions.
> Did you seed the system vm template onto the sec. storage ? And can you
> mount that template loc
I may be remembering this incorrectly, but for VMware doesn't the
management server have to be able to mount the secondary storage NFS share
to /mnt/sec?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Couple of questions.
> Did you seed the system vm template onto the sec. storage ? And
Couple of questions.
Did you seed the system vm template onto the sec. storage ? And can you
mount that template location in sec. storage on your management server ?
On 20/02/14 6:32 PM, "Michael Phillips" wrote:
>Hey dev guys, I just recently got CS up and running with vmware. However
>I am run
25 matches
Mail list logo
