On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:51:55PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
> I wrote all the code. So I just released version 0.1.1 which is
> licensed ASLv2.
>
> I just went for LGPLv2 because I needed some license. These are just
> bindings, so I don't care that much.
>
> Any objections against usi
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 09:53 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Chip Childers
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 05/21/2013 09:16 PM, Wido den
On 05/21/2013 09:53 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 05/21/2013 09:16 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
In the rbd-snap-clone [0] branch I'm working on the new RBD features
l
Just curious: Do you plan or already implement librbd api call with progress
callback? The storage operation usually takes a long time, without progress
bar, it's very difficult to know what's going on at the storage side.
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@wid
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/21/2013 09:16 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >In the rbd-snap-clone [0] branch I'm working on the new RBD features
>> >like snapshotting, clonin
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 05/21/2013 09:16 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >In the rbd-snap-clone [0] branch I'm working on the new RBD features
> >like snapshotting, cloning and deploying System VMs on RBD.
> >
> >To do this correctly
On 05/21/2013 09:16 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
In the rbd-snap-clone [0] branch I'm working on the new RBD features
like snapshotting, cloning and deploying System VMs on RBD.
To do this correctly I wrote Java bindings for librbd and librados (part
of the Ceph project).
These bindings
